Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630538›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Evolving assessment pathways for precision oncology medicines to improve patient access: a tumor-agnostic lens.

Priscila Radu, Gayathri Kumar, Amanda Cole, Aikaterini Fameli, Mark Guthrie, Lieven Annemans, Jan Geissler, Antoine Italiano, Brian O'Rourke, Entela Xoxi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic challenges and treatment barriers in the management of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Priscila RaduOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-1364-8629
Gayathri KumarOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda ColeOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
Aikaterini FameliGlobal Oncology Policy, GSK, London, United Kingdom.
Mark GuthrieGlobal Access Strategy Oncology, Roche, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Lieven AnnemansDepartment of Health Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-7210
Jan GeisslerPatvocates, Munich, Germany.
Antoine ItalianoEarly Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Brian O'RourkeISPOR, Ottawa, Canada.
Entela XoxiFaculty of Economics, ALTEMS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Lotte SteutenOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic and molecular alterations are increasingly important in cancer diagnosis, and scientific advances are opening new treatment avenues. Precision oncology (PO) uses a patient's genomic profile to determine optimal treatment, promising fewer side effects and higher success rates. Within PO, tumor-agnostic (TA) therapies target genomic alterations irrespective of tumor location. However, traditional value frameworks and approval pathways pose challenges which may limit patient access to PO therapies.

objectivesThis study describes challenges in assessing PO and TA medicines, explores possible solutions, and provides actionable recommendations to facilitate an iterative life-cycle assessment of these medicines.

methodsAfter reviewing the published literature, we obtained insights from key stakeholders and European experts across a range of disciplines, through individual interviews and an industry workshop. The research was guided and refined by an international expert committee through 2 sounding board meetings.

resultsThe current challenges faced by PO and TA medicines are multiple and can be demonstrated through real-world examples of the current barriers and opportunities. A life-cycle approach to assessment should be taken, including key actions at the early stages of evidence generation, regulatory and reimbursement stage, as well as payment and adoption solutions that make use of the evolving evidence base. Working toward these solutions to maximize PO medicine value is a shared responsibility and stands to benefit all stakeholders.

conclusionsOur call to action is to expand access to comprehensive genomic testing, foster a learning health care system, enable fast and equitable access to cost-effective treatments, and ultimately improve health outcomes.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedical OncologyAntineoplastic Agentslife-cycle assessmentpersonalized medicineprecision oncologytumor-agnostic

Identifiers

PMID38630538
PMCPMC11144967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.