Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630531›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2024

Development of Web-Based Education Modules to Improve Carer Engagement in Cancer Care: Design and User Experience Evaluation of the e-Triadic Oncology (eTRIO) Modules for Clinicians, Patients, and Carers.

Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell, Sarah Giunta, Phyllis Butow, Rachael Keast, Bogda Koczwara, Judy Kay, Michael Jefford, Sandra Turner, Christobel Saunders, Penelope Schofield and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebekah Laidsaar-PowellCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3462-5645
Sarah GiuntaCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-0170
Phyllis ButowCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3562-6954
Rachael KeastCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-8011
Bogda KoczwaraFlinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1201-1642
Judy KaySchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-2768
Michael JeffordHealth Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-7807
Sandra TurnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7669-8316
Christobel SaundersDepartment of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2281-9829
Penelope SchofieldHealth Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-9543
Frances BoyleFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-1570
Patsy YatesFaculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-8504
Kate WhiteSusan Wakil School of Nursing, The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-1734
Annie MillerCancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-3751-7836
Zoe ButtCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-1308
Melanie BonnaudetSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-6978-1457
Ilona JuraskovaCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9396-4113
The University of Sydney · AUCancer Council Australia · AUCancer Council NSW · AUFlinders University · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarers often assume key roles in cancer care. However, many carers report feeling disempowered and ill-equipped to support patients. Our group published evidence-based guidelines (the Triadic Oncology [TRIO] Guidelines) to improve oncology clinician engagement with carers and the management of challenging situations involving carers.

objectiveTo facilitate implementation of the TRIO Guidelines in clinical practice, we aimed to develop, iteratively refine, and conduct user testing of a suite of evidence-based and interactive web-based education modules for oncology clinicians (e-Triadic Oncology [eTRIO]), patients with cancer, and carers (eTRIO for Patients and Carers [eTRIO-pc]). These were designed to improve carer involvement, communication, and shared decision-making in the cancer management setting.

methodsThe eTRIO education modules were based on extensive research, including systematic reviews, qualitative interviews, and consultation analyses. Guided by the person-based approach, module content and design were reviewed by an expert advisory group comprising academic and clinical experts (n=13) and consumers (n=5); content and design were continuously and iteratively refined. User experience testing (including "think-aloud" interviews and administration of the System Usability Scale [SUS]) of the modules was completed by additional clinicians (n=5), patients (n=3), and carers (n=3).

resultsThe final clinician module comprises 14 sections, requires approximately 1.5 to 2 hours to complete, and covers topics such as carer-inclusive communication and practices; supporting carer needs; and managing carer dominance, anger, and conflicting patient-carer wishes. The usability of the module was rated by 5 clinicians, with a mean SUS score of 75 (SD 5.3), which is interpreted as good. Clinicians often desired information in a concise format, divided into small "snackable" sections that could be easily recommenced if they were interrupted. The carer module features 11 sections; requires approximately 1.5 hours to complete; and includes topics such as the importance of carers, carer roles during consultations, and advocating for the patient. The patient module is an adaptation of the relevant carer module sections, comprising 7 sections and requiring 1 hour to complete. The average SUS score as rated by 6 patients and carers was 78 (SD 16.2), which is interpreted as good. Interactive activities, clinical vignette videos, and reflective learning exercises are incorporated into all modules. Patient and carer consumer advisers advocated for empathetic content and tone throughout their modules, with an easy-to-read and navigable module interface.

conclusionsThe eTRIO suite of modules were rigorously developed using a person-based design methodology to meet the unique information needs and learning requirements of clinicians, patients, and carers, with the goal of improving effective and supportive carer involvement in cancer consultations and cancer care.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsEducational StatusHumansInternetLearningMedical Oncologyfamily carershealth professional educationmobile phonepatient educationweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID38630531
PMCPMC11063882
OpenAlexW4391410519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.