Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630427›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Pathological findings in South American camelids presented at a farm animal clinic in Northern Germany (2005-2021).

Saskia Neubert, Christina Puff, Sven Kleinschmidt, Patricia Kammeyer, Alexandra von Altrock, Michael Wendt, Matthias Gerhard Wagener

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alpaca Farming and Management Practices in Poland: Online Questionnaire.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saskia NeubertClinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173, Hannover, Germany. neubert.saskia@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-6686
Christina PuffDepartment of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2592-6868
Sven KleinschmidtLower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Food and Veterinary Institute Braunschweig/Hannover, 30173, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2690-6153
Patricia KammeyerLower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Food and Veterinary Institute Braunschweig/Hannover, 30173, Hannover, Germany.
Alexandra von AltrockClinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-3608
Michael WendtClinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-0859
Matthias Gerhard WagenerClinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3366-8579
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DELower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To expand the knowledge about common diseases in llamas and alpacas in Germany, a screening of the cases of South American camelids presented at the Clinic for Swine and Small Ruminants of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany from 2005 to the end of November 2021 was performed. A retrospective evaluation of necropsy reports from this period was conducted. Overall, necropsy reports were evaluated from 187 alpacas, 35 llamas and one vicuña (n = 223). A total of 50.2% of the dissected animals were thin or cachectic. Pathological alterations of the gastrointestinal tract were the most common findings (44.8%). In addition, liver changes were recorded, most frequently in adult animals. In contrast, diseases of the respiratory tract and the nervous system were found more frequently in juvenile animals. This study provides an overview of common pathologies in South American camelids in Germany and thus may help to recognise different disease symptoms at an early stage.

Indexed as

Camelids, New WorldAnimalsFemaleGermanyMaleRetrospective StudiesAlpacaDiseasesLlamaNecropsySouth American camelidsVeterinary pathology

Identifiers

PMID38630427
PMCPMC11315760
OpenAlexW4394873853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.