Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630378›Full record

ReviewClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2024

Sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of multiple system atrophy.

Fabian Leys, Sabine Eschlböck, Nicole Campese, Philipp Mahlknecht, Marina Peball, Georg Goebel, Victoria Sidoroff, Florian Krismer, Roberta Granata, Stefan Kiechl and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multiple system atrophy: cure and care.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does gender make a difference in endodontic care delivery?International endodontic journal · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabian LeysDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabine EschlböckDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Nicole CampeseDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp MahlknechtDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marina PeballDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Georg GoebelInstitute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Victoria SidoroffDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Florian KrismerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Roberta GranataDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan KiechlDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Werner PoeweDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Klaus SeppiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gregor K WenningDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alessandra FanciulliDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. alessandra.fanciulli@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-4179
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of multiple system atrophy (MSA) through a literature review and an analysis of a retrospective cohort.

methodsThe PubMed database was searched for articles including sex-related information in MSA. In a retrospective Innsbruck cohort, we investigated the baseline to last available follow-up clinical-demographic differences between men and women with MSA in a univariate fashion, followed by multivariable binary regression analysis.

resultsThe literature search yielded 46 publications with sex-related information in MSA. Most studies found comparable survival rates between the sexes, while some recent reports suggested a potential survival benefit for women, possibly due to initial motor onset and overall less severe autonomic failure compared to men. The retrospective Innsbruck MSA cohort comprised 56 female and 60 male individuals with a comparable median follow-up of 27 months. At baseline, female sex was independently associated with depression (odds ratio [OR] 4.7; p = 0.007) and male sex with severe orthostatic hypotension (OR 5.5; p = 0.016). In addition, at last follow-up, female sex was associated with the intake of central nervous system-active drugs (OR 4.1; p = 0.029), whereas male sex was associated with the presence of supine hypertension (OR 3.0; p = 0.020) and the intake of antihypertensive medications (OR 8.7; p = 0.001). Male sex was also associated with initiation of antihypertensive medications over the observation period (OR 12.4; p = 0.004).

conclusionThe available literature and findings of the present study indicate sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of MSA and its evolution over time, highlighting the importance of considering sex in symptom exploration, therapeutic decision-making, and future clinical trial design.

Indexed as

Multiple System AtrophySex CharacteristicsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesClinical presentationDifferencesGenderMultiple system atrophySex

Identifiers

PMID38630378
PMCPMC11127878
OpenAlexW4394874109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.