Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630275›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Home screening of taste and oral trigeminal function: a feasibility study.

Tomer Green, Mariano Mastinu, Anne Wolf, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Anna Aronis, Thomas Hummel, M Yanina Pepino, Masha Y Niv

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tomer GreenInstitute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Mariano MastinuSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany. mariano.mastinu@ukdd.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-9707
Anne WolfSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Anna OleszkiewiczSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Anna AronisInstitute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Thomas HummelSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
M Yanina PepinoDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Masha Y NivInstitute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Wrocław · PL

Funding

Israel Innovation Authority 1129/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposegustatory ability is a marker of health not routinely tested in the medical practice. The current study wants to assess whether taste strips can be useful to monitor taste function from home.

methodswe performed simple sensory tests in lab setting vs. unassisted testing at home, and compared the results with self-reports ability to taste and smell. Using paper strips impregnated with sweet, bitter, salty, or sour tastants, and with two trigeminal stimuli (capsaicin, tannins) in high and low concentrations, we assessed gustatory and trigeminal function in 74 participants (47 women) in the lab, where paper strips were administered by an experimenter, and in 77 participants (59 women) at home, where they self-administered the test.

resultswe found that high (but not low) concentration taste strips are correctly identified by vast majority of participants. On average, taste identification, intensity and pleasantness scores did not differ for the 8 taste strips, while identification of capsaicin was significantly better in the lab. Taste identification scores correlated with intensity ratings in both settings (r = 0.56, in the lab, r = 0.48, at home, p < 0.005). Self-rated taste ability correlated with self-rated smell ability (r = 0.68, and r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.005), but not with scores in the strips test.

conclusionhome testing with impregnated taste strips is feasible, and can be used for telemedical purposes.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesTasteTrigeminal NerveAdultAgedCapsaicinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmellYoung AdultCapsaicinGustatory assessmentSensory testsSeven-iTTSubjectiveTaste strips

Identifiers

PMID38630275
PMCPMC11392964
OpenAlexW4394869305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.