ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Radiomics-based detection of acute myocardial infarction on noncontrast enhanced midventricular short-axis cine CMR images.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of myocardial infarction by postmortem CT combined with radiomics-based machine-learning analysis.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- AI Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Effects of parametric feature maps on the reproducibility of radiomics from different fields of view in cardiac magnetic resonance cine images- a clinical and experimental study setting.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Radiomics for differential diagnosis of ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy using non-contrast-enhanced cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance cine images are primarily used to evaluate functional consequences, whereas limited information is extracted from the noncontrast pixel-wise myocardial signal intensity pattern. In this study we want to assess whether characterizing this inherent contrast pattern of noncontrast-enhanced short axis (SAX) cine images via radiomics is sufficient to distinguish subjects with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from controls. Cine balanced steady-state free-precession images acquired at 1.5 T from 99 AMI and 49 control patients were included. First, radiomic feature extraction of the left ventricular myocardium of end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) frames was performed based on automated (AUTO) or manually corrected (MAN) segmentations. Next, top features were selected based on optimal classification results using a support vector machine (SVM) approach. The classification performances of the four radiomics models (using AUTO or MAN segmented ED or ES images), were measured by AUC, classification accuracy (CA), F1-score, sensitivity and specificity. The most accurate model was found when combining the features RunLengthNonUniformity, ClusterShade and Median obtained from the manually segmented ES images (CA = 0.846, F1 score = 0.847). ED analysis performed worse than ES, with lower CA and F1 scores (0.769 and 0.770, respectively). Manual correction of automated contours resulted in similar model features as the automated segmentations and did not improve classification results. A radiomics analysis can capture the inherent contrast in noncontrast mid-ventricular SAX cine images to distinguishing AMI from healthy subjects. The ES radiomics model was more accurate than the ED model. Manual correction of the autosegmentation did not provide significant classification improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38630210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.