Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630179›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2024

Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nader M Hanna, Sunjay S Kumar, Amelia T Collings, Yagnik K Pandya, James Kurtz, Keshav Kooragayala, Meghan W Barber, Mykola Paranyak, Marina Kurian, Jeffrey Chiu and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-AHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamics of hiatal hernia recurrence: how important is a composite crural repair?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 4 countries.

Nader M HannaDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada. nader.hanna@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5341-4413
Sunjay S KumarDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amelia T CollingsHiram C. Polk, Jr Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Yagnik K PandyaDepartment of Surgery, MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA, USA.
James KurtzDepartment of Surgery, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Keshav KooragayalaDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Meghan W BarberDepartment of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USA.
Mykola ParanyakDepartment of General Surgery, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Marina KurianDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey ChiuAdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA.
Ahmed Abou-SettaCentre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Mohammed T AnsariIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bethany J SlaterDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Geoffrey P KohnDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shaun DalyDepartment of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA.
AdventHealth Orlando · USCooper University Hospital · USDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University · UAGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CAMetroWest Medical Center · USMonash University · AUNYU Langone Health · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · USQueen's University · CAThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively.

resultsWe included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I

conclusionsThe evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

FundoplicationHernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyRecurrenceSurgical MeshAsymptomatic DiseasesHumansReoperationFundoplicationHerniaHiatalMeshMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38630179
OpenAlexW4394873367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.