Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630158›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2024

Fluid dynamics within renal cavities during endoscopic stone surgery: does the position of the flexible ureteroscope and ureteral access sheath affect the outflow rate?

Arman Tsaturyan, Etienne X Keller, Angelis Peteinaris, Faria-Costa Gabriel, Amelia Pietropaolo, Begona Ballesta Martinez, Vaseilios Tatanis, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Francesco Esperto, Tarik Emre Sener and 7 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 11 countries.

Arman Tsaturyan *Department of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, 0087, Yerevan, Armenia. tsaturyanarman@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-7015
Etienne X Keller *EAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Angelis PeteinarisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece.
Faria-Costa GabrielDepartment of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Amelia PietropaoloEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Begona Ballesta MartinezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopo, Alicante, Spain.
Vaseilios TatanisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece.
Eugenio VentimigliaEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Francesco EspertoEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Tarik Emre SenerEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Vincent De ConinckEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Esteban EmilianiEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
B M Zeeshan HameedEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Michele TalsoEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Ioannis MykoniatisEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Lazaros TzelvesEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece.
European Association of Urology · NLUniversity of Patras · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRFather Muller Medical College Hospital · INHospital Universitario del Vinalopó · ESUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity College Hospital · GBVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of ureteroscope position within renal cavities as well as different locations of the tip of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) on fluid dynamics during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective observational clinical study was performed. Measurements with a flexible ureteroscope placed in the upper, middle and lower calyces were obtained with the tip of the UAS placed either 2 cm below the pyelo-ureteric junction (PUJ), or at the level of the iliac crest.

results74 patients were included. The outflow rates from the middle and upper calyxes were statistically significantly higher compared to the lower calyx, both with the UAS close to the pyelo-ureteric junction and at the iliac crest. When the UAS was withdrawn and positioned at the level of the iliac crest, a significant decrease in outflow rates from the upper (40.1 ± 4.3 ml/min vs 35.8 ± 4.1 ml/min) and middle calyces (40.6 ± 4.0 ml/min vs 36.8 ± 4.6 ml/min) and an increase in the outflow from the lower calyx (28.5 ± 3.3 ml/min vs 33.7 ± 5.7 ml/min) were noted.

conclusionsOur study showed that higher fluid outflow rates are observed from upper and middle calyces compared to lower calyx. This was true when the UAS was positioned 2 cm below the PUJ and at the iliac crest. Significant worsening of fluid dynamics from upper and middle calyces was observed when the UAS was placed distally at the level of the iliac crest. While the difference was statistically significant, the absolute change was not significant. In contrast, for lower calyces, a statistically significant improvement was documented.

Indexed as

UreterUreteroscopesEndoscopyHumansHydrodynamicsKidneyFluid dynamicsIntrarenal pressureOutflow rateRetrograde intrarenal surgeryUreteral access sheath

Identifiers

PMID38630158
OpenAlexW4394873467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.