Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630143›Full record

ReviewInternational ophthalmology2024

Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil versus interferon α-2b as adjuvant therapy after surgery in ocular surface squamous neoplasia in a southern European tertiary hospital.

José Javier San Román Llorens, Marta Fernández-Gurria, June Artaechevarria Artieda, Nicolas Alejandre Alba, Blanca García Sandoval, Ignacio Jiménez-Alfaro Morote

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Javier San Román LlorensUniversity Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Avenida Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain. jose.sanroman@quironsalud.es.
Marta Fernández-GurriaUniversity Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Avenida Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
June Artaechevarria ArtiedaUniversity Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Avenida Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Nicolas Alejandre AlbaUniversity Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Avenida Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Blanca García SandovalUniversity Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Avenida Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Jiménez-Alfaro MoroteUniversity Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Avenida Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) compared to interferon α-2b (IFNα-2b) after surgery in ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN).

methodsRetrospective study that included patients diagnosed with OSSN, who underwent surgical excision followed by adjuvant therapy with IFN α-2b (Group A) or 5-FU (Group B), in a tertial referral hospital. Clinical data collected included: demographics, risk factors, appearance, size and location of the lesions, slit-lamp examination, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, iconography and histological classification of subtypes of OSSN. Costs derived from surgery and adjuvant therapy were noted. Resolution of the lesion, recurrences and adverse events were studied. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with the incremental cost-effectiveness index (CEI).

results54 cases of 54 patients were included, with a mean age of 74.4 years (range 28-109). 30 were male (55.6%), and predominantly Caucasian (79.6%). The main risk factor was prolonged sun exposure (79.6%). Leukoplakic appearance (48.1%), location in bulbar conjunctiva (48.2%) and T3 (46.3%) stage were the most common clinical features. Histologically, the percentage of CIN I, CIN II, CIN III and SCC were 25.9%, 29.6%, 40.7% and 3.7%, respectively. Complete resolution was obtained in 74.1% and tolerance was overall positive. The cost was significantly higher for IFNα (1025€ ± 130.68€) compared to 5-FU (165.57€ ± 45.85 €) (p 0.001). The CEI was - 247.14€.

conclusionsBoth 5-FU and IFN α-2b are effective and present a good security profile as adjuvant therapies after surgery in OSSN. Although presenting slightly more ocular complications, 5-FU can be considered more cost-effective than IFN α-2b.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellConjunctival NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConjunctivaCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleFluorouracilHumansInterferon-alphaInterferon alpha-2MaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesFluorouracilInterferon-alphaInterferon alpha-25-FUCost-effectivenessEfficacyIFNα2bIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioOcular surface squamous neoplasiaSafety

Identifiers

PMID38630143
OpenAlexW4394873216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.