Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38629953›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2024

Is Incentive Spirometry Superior to Standard Care in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery on Clinical Outcomes and Length of Hospital and Intensive Care Unit Stay? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Hiago Vinicius Costa Silva, Adriana Claudia Lunardi, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto, Juliana Ribeiro Fonseca Franco de Macedo, Elinaldo da Conceição Dos Santos

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hiago Vinicius Costa SilvaDepartment of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.
Adriana Claudia LunardiPrograma de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Fisioterapia, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes PintoDepartment of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.
Juliana Ribeiro Fonseca Franco de MacedoDepartment of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Elinaldo da Conceição Dos SantosDepartment of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4039-2980
Universidade Federal do Amapá · BRUCLouvain · BEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac surgery is a frequent surgical procedure and may present a high risk of complications. Among the prophylactic strategies studied to decrease the rates of negative outcomes, respiratory care seems to reduce pulmonary complications. Incentive spirometry (IS) is a low-cost, respiratory exercise technique, used for the prevention and treatment of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). The aim of this review was to evaluate whether IS is superior to respiratory care, mobilization exercises, and noninvasive ventilation on PPC, and clinical outcomes.

methodsSystematic review. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (or MEDLINE®), Embase®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (or CENTRAL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (or PEDro), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (or CINAHL®), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (or LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (or SciELO), Allied, Scopus®, and OpenGrey databases, clinical trial registration sites, conferences, congresses, and symposiums were searched.

resultsTwenty-one randomized trials and one quasi-randomized trial (1,677 participants) were included. For partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), IS was inferior to respiratory care (mean difference [MD] -4.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.32 to -0.63). Flow-oriented IS was inferior to respiratory care on PaO2 (MD -4.53; 95% CI -8.88 to -0.18). However, compared to respiratory care, flow-oriented IS was superior on recovery vital capacity.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis revealed that IS was not superior to standard respiratory care for PPCs and clinical outcomes, therefore its use should not be widely recommended until further studies with high quality be performed to ensure this clinical guidance.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresSpirometryHospitalsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMotivationOxygenPhysical Therapy ModalitiesOxygenCardiac Surgical ProceduresNoninvasive VentilationPostoperative CareSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID38629953
PMCPMC11020284
OpenAlexW4394873211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.