Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38629803›Full record

ArticleALTEX2024

60 Years of the 3Rs symposium: Lessons learned and the road ahead.

Michael Balls, Rolf Bass, Rodger Curren, Julia Fentem, Alan Goldberg, Thomas Hartung, Kathrin Herrmann, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Lisa Libowitz, John Parascandola and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ALTEX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael BallsFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Rolf BassCharité - University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Rodger CurrenInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Julia FentemUnilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Colworth Science Park, Bedfordshire, UK.
Alan GoldbergCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas HartungCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathrin HerrmannCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nicole C KleinstreuerNational Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Lisa LibowitzBaltimore, MD, USA.
John ParascandolaBethesda, MD, USA.
Andrew RowanWellbeing International, Potomac, MD, USA.
Horst SpielmannInstitut für Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin L StephensCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Russell S ThomasCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Katya TsaiounCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique was published in 1959, authors William Russell and Rex Burch had a modest goal: to make researchers think about what they were doing in the laboratory – and to do it more humanely. Sixty years later, their groundbreaking book was celebrated for inspiring a revolution in science and launching a new field: The 3Rs of alternatives to animal experimentation. On November 22, 2019, some pioneering and leading scientists and researchers in the field gathered at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Bal­timore for the 60 Years of the 3Rs Symposium: Lessons Learned and the Road Ahead. The event was sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the Foundation for Chemistry Research and Initiatives, the Alternative Research & Development Foundation (ARDF), the American Cleaning Institute (ACI), the International Fragrance Association (IFRA), the Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS), John “Jack” R. Fowle III, and the Society of Toxicology (SoT). Fourteen pres­entations shared the history behind the groundbreaking publication, international efforts to achieve its aims, stumbling blocks to progress, as well as remarkable achievements. The day was a tribute to Russell and Burch, and a testament to what is possible when people from many walks of life – science, government, and industry – work toward a common goal.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimal Testing AlternativesAnimalsAnimal WelfareResearch Design3R principle3Rsalternatives to animal experimentationhistorynew approach methodologies (NAMs)Russell & Burch

Identifiers

PMID38629803
PMCPMC12097330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.