Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38629623›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2024

Computational repurposing of oncology drugs through off-target drug binding interactions from pharmacological databases.

Imogen R Walpole, Farzana Y Zaman, Peinan Zhao, Vikki M Marshall, Frank P Lin, David M Thomas, Mark Shackleton, Albert A Antolin, Malaka Ameratunga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Imogen R WalpoleDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-2297-0931
Farzana Y ZamanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Peinan ZhaoSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Vikki M MarshallSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Frank P LinNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
David M ThomasGarvan Institute of Medical Research, St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Mark ShackletonDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Albert A AntolinProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Malaka AmeratungaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AUMonash University · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUInstitute of Cancer Research · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSystematic repurposing of approved medicines for another indication may accelerate drug development in oncology. We present a strategy combining biomarker testing with drug repurposing to identify new treatments for patients with advanced cancer.

methodsTumours were sequenced with the Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO-500) platform or the FoundationOne CDx panel. Mutations were screened by two medical oncologists and pathogenic mutations were categorised referencing literature. Variants of unknown significance were classified as potentially pathogenic using plausible mechanisms and computational prediction of pathogenicity. Gain of function (GOF) mutations were evaluated through repurposing databases Probe Miner (PM), Broad Institute Drug Repurposing Hub (Broad Institute DRH) and TOPOGRAPH. GOF mutations were repurposing events if identified in PM, not indexed in TOPOGRAPH and excluding mutations with a known Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomarker. The computational repurposing approach was validated by evaluating its ability to identify FDA-approved biomarkers. The total repurposable genome was identified by evaluating all possible gene-FDA drug-approved combinations in the PM dataset.

resultsThe computational repurposing approach was accurate at identifying FDA therapies with known biomarkers (94%). Using next-generation sequencing molecular reports (n = 94), a meaningful percentage of patients (14%) could have an off-label therapeutic identified. The frequency of theoretical drug repurposing events in The Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer dataset was 73% of the samples in the cohort.

conclusionA computational drug repurposing approach may assist in identifying novel repurposing events in cancer patients with no access to standard therapies. Further validation is needed to confirm a precision oncology approach using drug repurposing.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBiomarkersDrug RepositioningHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPrecision MedicineBiomarkersPharmaceutical Preparationsdrug repurposingprecision oncologysequencing

Identifiers

PMID38629623
PMCPMC11022299
OpenAlexW4394873343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.