SynthesisInternational wound journal2024
Effect of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure wound therapy in treating patients with chronic wounds: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure wound therapy in treating patients with chronic wounds: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- RETRACTION: Effect of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative pressure wound therapy in treating patients with chronic wounds: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma in Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Health science reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-11-12Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively explore the effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating patients with chronic wounds. Computer searches were conducted, from database infection to November 2023, in EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of PRP combined with NPWT technology for treating chronic wounds. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessments according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Overall, 18 RCTs involving 1294 patients with chronic wounds were included. The analysis revealed that, compared with NPWT alone, the use of PRP combined with NPWT technology significantly improved the healing rate (odds ratios [OR] = 1.92, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.43-2.58, p < 0.001) and total effective rate (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.23-1.39, p < 0.001), and also significantly shortened the healing time of the wound (standardized mean difference = -2.01, 95% CI: -2.58 to -1.45, p < 0.001). This study indicates that the treatment of chronic wounds with PRP combined with NPWT technology can significantly enhance clinical repair effectiveness and accelerate wound healing, with a high healing rate, and is worth further promotion and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.