Trial reportCurrent pediatric reviews2025
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Beraksurf and Curosurf Exogenous Surfactants in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates: A Double-blind Randomized Study in the West of Iran.
Trial report in Current pediatric reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo date, few studies have compared the effectiveness of exogenous surfactant therapy with Curosurf and Beraksurf in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm neonates.
objectiveSince surfactant has a significant impact on the treatment of neonates with RDS, this study was conducted to introduce a more effective method for treating preterm neonates with RDS.
methodsThe present clinical trial was conducted on 140 preterm neonates with RDS in the NICU department of two specialized university hospitals in Hamadan, western Iran. In one group, we used the Iranian-made surfactant Beraksurf, and in another group, we used the Italian-made surfactant Curosurf. In the end, the checklist for the two groups was completed. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22, and a significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.
resultsThe comparison of the frequency distribution of maternal corticosteroid administration, response to treatment and need for re-intubation, associated disorders, and mortality among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant did not show a significant difference (p=0.962, 0.763, 0.725 and 0.149, respectively). Further, the comparison of the mean number of days requiring respiratory support, days free from respiratory support, and hospitalization days among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant injection did not show a significant difference (p=0.910, 0.725, and 0.898, respectively). Additionally, the comparison of the time of initiation of feeding and the time of reaching maximum feeding among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant injection also did not show significant differences (p=0.881 and 0.903, respectively).
conclusionBased on the fact that Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactants did not show significant differences in the treatment outcomes of RDS in preterm neonates, it is suggested that the Iranianmade surfactant, Beracsurf, should be used for the treatment of these neonates due to its cost-effectiveness and availability compared to Curosurf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.