ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2024
Fosfomycin susceptibility testing and resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales in South Africa.
Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Insight into the Mobility of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Whole-genome characterisation of high-risk ST131 and the emerging ST1193 UPEC lineages in Romanian patients with recurrent urinary tract infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization of carbapenem resistance mechanisms and phenotypic correlations in clinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Fosfomycin-Overcoming Problematic In Vitro Susceptibility Testing and Tricky Result Interpretation: Comparison of Three Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections is increasingly attractive due to escalating antibiotic resistance rates among urinary pathogens. Standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods perform poorly for fosfomycin as there is poor correlation between susceptibility results and clinical outcomes in urinary pathogens other than Objective: We evaluated the performance of fosfomycin susceptibility testing in Methods: Forty-six each of Results: Disk diffusion and gradient diffusion were accurate alternatives for fosfomycin susceptibility testing in Conclusion: A better understanding of fosfomycin susceptibility and improved antibiotic susceptibility testing tools could improve diagnostic capability and clinical guidelines for fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections. What this study adds: This study highlights the importance of adhering to interpretive guidelines when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the need for simplified, accurate and standardised susceptibility testing methodology and interpretation for fosfomycin in Enterobacterales organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.