Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38629015›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparative Evaluation of Push-Out Bond Strength of Conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Biodentine, a Modified Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Two Novel Antibacterial-Enhanced Mineral Trioxide Aggregates.

Arokia Rajkumar Shancy Merlin, Vignesh Ravindran, Ganesh Jeevanandan, Rajalakshmanan Eswaramoorthy, Abirami Arthanari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arokia Rajkumar Shancy MerlinDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Vignesh RavindranDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Ganesh JeevanandanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Rajalakshmanan EswaramoorthyCenter of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Abirami ArthanariDepartment of Forensic Odontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The challenges associated with incorporating antimicrobial agents, such as the potential diminishment of the cement's physical properties, highlight the need for comprehensive evaluations. Balancing antimicrobial efficacy with the maintenance of structural integrity is a crucial aspect of material development. The acknowledgment of cytotoxic properties associated with tricalcium aluminate, a major constituent in conventional mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), is critical in terms of long-term evaluation of treatment procedures. The primary focus of the push-out test is to evaluate the resistance of the tested material to dislodgement. Greater push-out strength implies stronger adhesion between the tested material and the tooth surface. Aim This study aims to evaluate the push-out bond strength of two antibacterial-enhanced MTAs with conventional MTA and Biodentine. Material and methods A total of five materials were tested: a) modified MTA, b) doxycycline-enhanced MTA, c) metronidazole-enhanced MTA, d) conventional MTA, and e) Biodentine. All the materials were mixed based on a predetermined powder:liquid ratio and then carried using a plastic instrument to the desired experimental design. Single-rooted permanent teeth, preferably incisors, were used in the present study. Teeth were embedded vertically in a rubber mold, and sectioning of the tooth was performed. A single operator instrumented the canal space in each slice using Gates-Glidden burs, and the mixed cements were placed in the respective groups and stored for 72 hours. A push-out test was carried out using a universal testing machine. Following the bond failure, the slices were examined under a stereomicroscope to determine the nature of the bond failure. The collected data was subjected to a one-way analysis of variance test, post hoc test, and chi-square test for statistical analysis. Results The mean push-out bond strength was found to be the highest for Biodentine (43.25 ± 0.62 megapascals (MPa)), followed by doxycycline- and metronidazole-enhanced MTAs (39.54 ± 0.65 MPa and 39.29 ± 0.16 MPa, respectively), modified MTA formulation (37.75 ± 0.73 MPa), and the lowest for conventional MTA (25.93 ± 0.7 MPa). Conventional MTA samples had an adhesive failure (89.4%), while Biodentine samples had a cohesive failure (80.3%). Mixed failures were noticed with the samples containing modified MTA formulation (71.3%), doxycycline-enhanced MTA (76.6%), and metronidazole-enhanced MTA (78.0%). Conclusion Despite not surpassing Biodentine in bond strength, antibacterial-enhanced MTAs are considered potential alternatives to conventional MTA in day-to-day clinical practice.

Indexed as

biodentinedoxycyclinemetronidazolemineral trioxide aggregatepushout bond strength

Identifiers

PMID38629015
PMCPMC11019474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.