ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Multimodal imaging of white preretinal lesions in atypical familial exudative vitreoretinopathy: Case report and literature review.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Features of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy: The Genetic and Phenotypic Spectrum.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a rare clinical finding of preretinal granules associated with atypical familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) and perform a review of the literature. Observations: An asymptomatic 18-year-old male was referred for unilateral peripheral avascular retina evaluation in association with presumed FEVR. He was first noted to have white preretinal granules on fundus examination at five years of age. The lesions remained unchanged over the subsequent years. Genetic testing did not reveal a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a known FEVR gene. A review of the literature revealed five other cases of FEVR with similar findings. Conclusions and Importance: Literature review suggests preretinal granules may present rarely in FEVR. Negative genetic screening of known FEVR genes in our patient with atypical FEVR suggests either a molecularly distinct etiology supporting the rarity of this association with FEVR or, alternatively, the presence of granules in developmental retinal vascular anomalies that are not specific to FEVR. Future study and genetic testing is necessary to better understand the cause of these preretinal granules and the clinical manifestations of FEVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.