ArticleHeliyon2024
Determining key factors affecting coconut sap quality after harvesting.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of coconut sap beverages faces a challenge with the quality of the incoming coconut sap sourced from farmers. The clarification of pivotal factors influencing the quality of coconut sap after harvesting is of paramount importance for fostering mutual benefit between the involved parties. This research focuses on assessing the quality and degradation of coconut sap during the post-harvest stage. It addresses the shortcomings in evaluating coconut sap quality and improper pick-up conditions. To improve these processes, various experiments were designed, including 1) preliminary experiments that explored microbial count, pH, and soluble solids in harvested coconut sap at varying intervals, and 2) the L9 Taguchi Orthogonal Array method. These approaches identify the optimal levels of factors such as cleaning method, storage temperature, and preservative type. By reducing the number of experiments, costs and time were minimized, 3) the 23 factorial design was implemented, reducing the levels of each factor while measuring coconut sap quality based on pH and total soluble solids (representing sweetness) at different post-harvest intervals. The results from the Taguchi method were then used to design the factorial method experiment. The analysis revealed crucial factors influencing coconut sap quality at the 10-h mark. Storage and transportation temperatures, along with the type of preservative, significantly impacted the pH value. However, the washing method and preservative type showed no statistically significant effect on Total Soluble Solids (TSS) value (p > 0.05). Recommendations include using tap water for container cleaning, opting for Payom wood as a preservative, and adhering to cold chain practices for transportation exceeding 4 h, with temperatures maintained below or equal to 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.