ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2024
Comparative review of muscle fiber characteristics between porcine skeletal muscles.
Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- PFKM Modulates Porcine Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cell Differentiation Through Metabolic and Mitochondrial Pathways.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- A scalable framework for single-cell eQTL mapping uncovers genetic regulators of meat production traits in pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Impact of increasing market pig weights in North America: a comprehensive review.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Swine reporter model for preclinical evaluation and characterization of gene delivery vectors.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Developmental dynamics of skeletal muscle can be recapitulated in vitro from pig embryonic stem cells.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Copper Citrate and Copper Sulfate on Intestinal Health, Muscle Fiber Traits, and Antioxidant Capacity in Weaned Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Investigation of myofiber composition changes and molecular mechanisms in rabbit meat quality development during growth.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Integrated analysis of DNA methylome and transcriptome of the backfat and longissimus dorsi muscle of Chinese-European hybrid pigs.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and metabolites in lipid metabolism and intramuscular fat deposition: mechanisms and implications for meat quality.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-responsive Janus patch with mechanical anisotropy, pro-healing, and anti-adhesion properties for abdominal wall defect repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Dynamic Interactions between the Gut Microbiome, Health, and Metabolic Disorders in Preterm Infants.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Article
- Integrated proteomics and transcriptomics analysis of dynamic changes in muscle fiber types in different regions of porcine skeletal muscle.Advanced biotechnology · 2025Article
- Carnosine and Acyl Carnitines as Metabolic Determinants of Muscle Phenotypic Differences Between Longissimus Dorsi and Triceps Brachii in Hanzhong Sheep.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identification of the putative regulatory regions and candidate genes associated with backfat thickness and intramuscular fat content traits in Xiang pigs.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals Lysine-Mediated Proliferative Mechanisms in Mongolian Horse Myogenic Satellite Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Identification and Functional Validation ofGenes · 2025Article
- Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and production traits in pigs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Integrative genetic and epigenetic control of skeletal muscle fiber traits in agricultural animals.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Effects of Flavonoids inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meat derived from skeletal muscles of animals is a highly nutritious type of food, and different meat types differ in nutritional, sensory, and quality properties. This study was conducted to compare the results of previous studies on the muscle fiber characteristics of major porcine skeletal muscles to the end of providing basic data for understanding differences in physicochemical and nutritional properties between different porcine muscle types (or meat cuts). Specifically, the muscle fiber characteristics between 19 major porcine skeletal muscles were compared. The muscle fibers that constitute porcine skeletal muscle can be classified into several types based on their contractile and metabolic characteristics. In addition, the muscle fiber characteristics, including size, composition, and density, of each muscle type were investigated and a technology based on these muscle fiber characteristics for improving meat quality or preventing quality deterioration was briefly discussed. This comparative review revealed that differences in muscle fiber characteristics are primarily responsible for the differences in quality between pork cuts (muscle types) and also suggested that data on muscle fiber characteristics can be used to develop optimal meat storage and packaging technologies for each meat cut (or muscle type).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.