Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628684›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2024

Effects of supplemental bacteriophage on the gut microbiota and nutrient digestibility of ileal-cannulated pigs.

Hyunwoong Jo, Geongoo Han, Eun Bae Kim, Changsu Kong, Beob Gyun Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dietary supplementation ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current research in food science · 2025
    Article
  9. Functional evaluation of synbiotic combination ofCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  12. The current state of phage therapy in livestock and companion animals.Journal of animal science and technology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyunwoong JoMonogastric Animal Feed Research Institute, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-6041
Geongoo HanMolecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, Providence 02912, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-1185
Eun Bae KimDepartment of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-2012
Changsu KongDepartment of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3876-6488
Beob Gyun KimMonogastric Animal Feed Research Institute, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-717X
Kangwon National University · KRBrown University · USKonkuk University · KRKyungpook National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study measured the potential changes of the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract and energy and nutrient digestibility by supplemental bacteriophages in pigs. Twelve castrated male pigs (initial mean body weight = 29.5 ± 2.3 kg) were surgically cannulated using T-cannula. The animals were housed individually in pens equipped with a feeder and a nipple waterer. The pigs were allotted to 1 of 3 experimental diets in a quadruplicated 3 × 2 Latin square design with 3 experimental diets, 2 periods, and 12 pigs resulting in 8 replicates per diet. The 3 diets were a control mainly based on corn and soybean meal with no antibiotics or bacteriophages, a diet containing 0.1% antibiotics, and a diet containing 0.2% bacteriophages. On day 5 of the experimental period, feces were collected and on days 6 and 7, ileal digesta were collected. Genomic DNA for bacteria were extracted from the ileal digesta and feces and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified. The ileal and fecal digestibility of energy, dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and fiber was unaffected by dietary antibiotics or bacteriophages. At the phylum level, the supplemental antibiotic or bacteriophage tended to result in a higher proportion of

Indexed as

AdditiveAntibioticDigestibilityLactobacillusPigProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID38628684
PMCPMC11016748
OpenAlexW4386629709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.