ArticleDigital health
Tweaking algorithms. Technopolitical issues associated with artificial intelligence based tuberculosis detection in global health.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing computer‑aided detection for TB active case finding: A qualitative study of feasibility and acceptability in Tondo, Manila.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Computer-aided detection pragmatic threshold calibration in TB active case finding: A mixed-methods study in Tondo, Manila.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Integration of AI and ML in Tuberculosis (TB) Management: From Diagnosis to Drug Discovery.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-aided detection algorithms based on artificial intelligence are increasingly being tested and used as a means for detecting tuberculosis in countries where the epidemic is still present. Computer-aided detection tools are often presented as a global solution that can be deployed in all the geographical areas concerned by tuberculosis, but at the same time, they need to be adjusted and calibrated according to local populations' characteristics. The aim of this article is to analyze the tensions between the standardization of computer-aided detection algorithms and their local adaptation and the political issues associated with these tensions. We undertook a qualitative analysis of practices associated with tuberculosis detection algorithms in different contexts, contrasting the perspectives of various stakeholders. Algorithms embed the promise of standardization through automation and the bypassing of variable human expertise such as that of radiologists, they are nonetheless objects of local practices that we have characterized as "tweaking." This work of tweaking reveals how the technology is situated but also the many concerns of the users and workers (insertion in care, control over infrastructure, and political ownership). This should be better considered to truly make computer-aided detection innovative tools for tuberculosis management in global health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.