Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628542›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2024

Surgical treatment of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with coexisting intracranial lesions: A case series and review of the literature.

Rodolfo Villalobos-Diaz, Ricardo Marian-Magaña, Marcos Vinicius Sangrador-Deitos, Rafael Vazquez-Gregorio, Luis Alberto Rodriguez-Hernandez, German Lopez-Valencia, Jorge Fernando Aragon-Arreola, Jorge Armando Lara-Olivas, Gerardo Yoshiaki Guinto-Nishimura, Aldo Gabriel Eguiluz-Melendez and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodolfo Villalobos-DiazDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ricardo Marian-MagañaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marcos Vinicius Sangrador-DeitosDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rafael Vazquez-GregorioDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Luis Alberto Rodriguez-HernandezDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
German Lopez-ValenciaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge Fernando Aragon-ArreolaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge Armando Lara-OlivasDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gerardo Yoshiaki Guinto-NishimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Aldo Gabriel Eguiluz-MelendezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Luis Gomez-AmadorDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are a diverse group of benign neoplasms that account for a significant proportion of intracranial tumors (13%). The coexistence of PitNET with other intracranial lesions, such as meningiomas and intracranial aneurysms, has been constantly reported in the literature; yet, the pathophysiological mechanisms remain unknown, and the appropriate management is controversial. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, surgical treatment, and outcomes of patients with PitNET with coexisting intracranial lesions in a single healthcare center. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 12 patients who underwent surgical treatment for PitNET and another intracranial lesion at our single tertiary referral center over 15 years from January 2008 to May 2023. Results: Among these coexisting lesions, aneurysms were the most commonly found (41.67%), followed by meningiomas (33.33%). Surgical intervention for both lesions was performed in a single-stage procedure for most cases (75%), employing transcranial, endoscopic endonasal, and combined approaches. We found low preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale scores in three patients, with significant differences in functional outcomes. Conclusion: These findings contribute to the limited knowledge about PitNET coexisting with other intracranial lesions and emphasize the importance of patient-tailored, multidisciplinary management in these unusual scenarios.

Indexed as

AneurysmCoexistingConcomitantMeningiomaPituitary adenomaPituitary neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID38628542
PMCPMC11021101
OpenAlexW4393096229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.