Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628541›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2024

Cortical incisions and transcortical approaches for intra-axial and intraventricular lesions: A scoping review.

Samer S Hoz, Mustafa Ismail, Paolo Palmisciano, Younus M Al-Khazaali, Saleh A Saleh, Ahmed Muthana, Jonathan A Forbes, Charles J Prestigiacomo, Mario Zuccarello, Norberto Andaluz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samer S HozDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Mustafa IsmailDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.
Paolo PalmiscianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States.
Younus M Al-KhazaaliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Saleh A SalehDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ahmed MuthanaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.
Jonathan A ForbesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States.
Charles J PrestigiacomoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States.
Mario ZuccarelloDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States.
Norberto AndaluzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcortical approaches, encompassing various surgical corridors, have been employed to treat an array of intraparenchymal or intraventricular brain pathologies, including tumors, vascular malformations, infections, intracerebral hematomas, and epileptic surgery. Designing cortical incisions relies on the lesion location and characteristics, knowledge of eloquent functional anatomy, and advanced imaging such as tractography. Despite their widespread use in neurosurgery, there is a noticeable lack of systematic studies examining their common lobe access points, associated complications, and prevalent pathologies. This scoping review assesses current evidence to guide the selection of transcortical approaches for treating a variety of intracranial pathologies. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included if ≥5 patients operated on using transcortical approaches, with reported data on clinical features, treatments, and outcomes. Data analysis and synthesis were performed. Results: A total of 50 articles encompassing 2604 patients were included in the study. The most common primary pathology was brain tumors (60.6%), particularly gliomas (87.4%). The transcortical-transtemporal approach was the most frequently identified cortical approach (70.48%), and the temporal lobe was the most accessed brain lobe (55.68%). The postoperative course outcomes were reported as good (55.52%), poor (28.38%), and death (14.62%). Conclusion: Transcortical approaches are crucial techniques for managing a wide range of intracranial lesions, with the transcortical-transtemporal approach being the most common. According to the current literature, the selective choice of cortical incision and surgical corridor based on the lesion's pathology and anatomic-functional location correlates with acceptable functional outcomes.

Indexed as

Intracranial lesionsSurgical approachTranscortical approachesTranscortical transtemporal

Identifiers

PMID38628541
PMCPMC11021096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.