ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Transmastoid pediatric penetrating brain injury, interdisciplinary, and tailored patient's treatment.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron rod-induced perforating head injury of the posterior cranial fossa: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Review
- The Neurobehavioral Response in a Rat Model of Brain Injury Using the Weight Drop Method.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric penetrating brain injuries (PBIs) are rare but critical traumatic events, often involving foreign objects. This report will emphasize the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment strategies for pediatric PBI cases. Case Description: This report presents a case of a 7-year-old male patient with a PBI resulting from a nail that penetrated the left mastoid region following a fall from a tree. On admission, the patient maintained consciousness, displayed stable vital signs, and showed no neurological deficits. Crucial radiological examinations, including skull X-rays and head computed tomography (CT) scans, revealed a 6.5 mm caliber nail penetrating 5.5 cm into the brain, with intraventricular hemorrhage filling the bilateral posterior horns of the lateral ventricles. In addition, the CT angiography (CTA) of the head provided a visual of the internal carotid arteries and the vertebrobasilar artery system, obscured by metal artifacts but showing no evidence of thrombus, aneurysm, or vascular malformation. The patient underwent an urgent mastoidectomy and retro sigmoid craniotomy to remove a foreign object, involving a multidisciplinary team. Subsequent to the intervention, the patient sustained full consciousness without neurological impairments and received intensive care. Conclusion: Radiological tools, notably skull X-rays and head CT scans, are pivotal for the precise diagnosis of pediatric PBI. The combined mastoidectomy and retro sigmoid craniotomy approach offers a safe and efficient means of foreign body removal. Tailoring treatments to individual patient needs enhances outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.