ArticleTrauma case reports2024
A secondary atypical diaphyseal femoral fracture after intramedullary nailing for an atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture: A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramedullary nailing is the gold standard of treatment for atypical femoral fractures, with a few reports of secondary atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures following intramedullary nailing for atypical diaphyseal femoral fractures. However, there are no reports of secondary atypical diaphyseal femoral fractures following intramedullary nailing for atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures. A 71-year-old woman with adult-onset Still's disease sustained a right atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture and was treated with a mid-length intramedullary nail. One year after the surgery, the patient sustained a contralateral atypical diaphyseal femoral fracture and was treated with a long-length intramedullary nail. Moreover, 6 months after the second surgery, the patient complained of right-thigh pain, and a radiograph of the lateral view of the femur revealed a diaphyseal femoral fracture at the distal screw-insertion site. Revision surgery was performed using a long-length nail and screws directed toward the femoral head. Bony union of the bilateral diaphyseal femoral lesion was obtained, but the subtrochanteric lesion remained unhealed 1.5 years postoperatively. Mid-length intramedullary nailing for atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures can cause secondary atypical diaphyseal fractures because of stress concentration at the distal screw-insertion site. For atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures, the use of long-length nails and proximal screws directed toward the femoral head may be important to prevent secondary atypical diaphyseal femoral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.