Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628358›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Comparison of the efficacy of thoracolumbosacral and lumbosacral orthosis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients with major thoracolumbar or lumbar curves: a prospective controlled study.

Lin Sha, Tianyuan Zhang, Wenyuan Sui, Qing Fan, Jingfan Yang, Yaolong Deng, Zifang Huang, Junlin Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin Sha *Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tianyuan Zhang *Spine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenyuan SuiSpine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qing FanDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingfan YangSpine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yaolong DengSpine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zifang HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Junlin YangDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) is the most commonly used type of brace for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Although lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is designed to correct single thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) curves, its effectiveness remains underexplored. This novel article aims to compare the effectiveness of LSO with TLSO in treating AIS with main TL/L curves. Methods: This prospective controlled cohort study enrolled patients with AIS with main TL/L curves and minor thoracic curves who were treated with either TLSO or LSO. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between the two groups. Treatment outcomes were also assessed. Risk factors for minor curve progression were identified, and a cut-off value was determined within the LSO group. Results: Overall, 82 patients were recruited, including 44 in the TLSO group and 38 in the LSO group. The initial TL/L curves showed no difference between both groups. However, the baseline thoracic curves were significantly larger in the TLSO group compared to the LSO group (25.98° ± 7.47° vs. 18.71° ± 5.95°, Discussion: In contrast to TLSO, LSO exhibits comparable effectiveness in treating main TL/L curves, making it a viable clinical option; however, it is less effective for thoracic minor curves. The initial magnitude of the minor thoracic curves may guide the selection of the appropriate brace type for patients with AIS with main TL/L curves.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosisbrace treatmentlumbar curveslumbosacral orthosis (LSO)thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO)

Identifiers

PMID38628358
PMCPMC11018990
OpenAlexW4393442894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.