ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2024
Estimating the effective reproduction number of COVID-19 from population-wide wastewater data: An application in Kagawa, Japan.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructing the incidence rate and immune fraction of the population via a single snapshot survey: A case study of COVID-19 in Japan.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- COVID-19 dynamic modeling of immune variability and multistage vaccination strategies: A case study in Malaysia.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although epidemiological surveillance of COVID-19 has been gradually downgraded globally, the transmission of COVID-19 continues. It is critical to quantify the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 using multiple datasets including wastewater virus concentration data. Herein, we propose a comprehensive method for estimating the effective reproduction number using wastewater data. The wastewater virus concentration data, which were collected twice a week, were analyzed using daily COVID-19 incidence data obtained from Takamatsu, Japan between January 2022 and September 2022. We estimated the shedding load distribution (SLD) as a function of time since the date of infection, using a model employing the delay distribution, which is assumed to follow a gamma distribution, multiplied by a scaling factor. We also examined models that accounted for the temporal smoothness of viral load measurement data. The model that smoothed temporal patterns of viral load was the best fit model (WAIC = 2795.8), which yielded a mean estimated distribution of SLD of 3.46 days (95% CrI: 3.01-3.95 days). Using this SLD, we reconstructed the daily incidence, which enabled computation of the effective reproduction number. Using the best fit posterior draws of parameters directly, or as a prior distribution for subsequent analyses, we first used a model that assumed temporal smoothness of viral load concentrations in wastewater, as well as infection counts by date of infection. In the subsequent approach, we examined models that also incorporated weekly reported case counts as a proxy for weekly incidence reporting. Both approaches enabled estimations of the epidemic curve as well as the effective reproduction number from twice-weekly wastewater viral load data. Adding weekly case count data reduced the uncertainty of the effective reproduction number. We conclude that wastewater data are still a valuable source of information for inferring the transmission dynamics of COVID-19, and that inferential performance is enhanced when those data are combined with weekly incidence data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.