ArticleATS scholar2024
Implementation and Evaluation of a Trainee Orientation Manual in an Intensive Care Unit Rotation.
Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The intensive care unit (ICU) rotation places trainees in a fast-paced, high-intensity environment that requires complex patient care and multidisciplinary coordination. Trainees seek continuous medical knowledge acquisition while tasked with learning ICU-specific workflows, procedures, and policies. The unfamiliarity with rotation logistics and administrative roles and expectations could hinder the ICU rotation learning experience. A lack of standardization and material for trainee orientation to administrative ICU tasks and workflows could affect the trainee's rotation performance and overall learner satisfaction. Objective: We evaluated the implementation of an ICU trainee manual to provide trainees with a source of orientation for rotation logistics and nonclinical ICU tasks. We assessd its impact on content retention, learners' satisfaction with the manual, and overall ICU rotation experience. Methods: We designed an observational, prospective cohort study that included all trainees scheduled to rotate in the ICU during the 2020-2021 academic year. The ICU manual was delivered electronically and was available throughout the academic year. Trainees received a survey before their first ICU rotation (pretest) and 6 months after their first ICU rotation (retest) to assess content retention, trainees' perception of the ICU manual, and overall rotation satisfaction. Results: A total of 95 trainees completed the pretest survey, and 61 completed the retest survey. The target cohort response rate for each survey was 100%. Pretest scores were higher than the matched retest scores (41 of 48 [interquartile range, 37-44] vs. 38 of 48 [34-41]; Conclusion: Implementing an ICU manual to orient trainees to their ICU clinical rotation was well received and showed continued retention of orientation content. Higher ICU rotation trainee satisfaction levels were related to a positive perception of the ICU manual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.