ArticleATS scholar2024
Entrustment Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: It's About More Than the Learner.
Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment methods in graduate medical education in critical care: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Specialty-associated differences in intensive care unit rotation exit examination performance: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the Numbers: Exploring Tensions Between Formal Entrustment and Trainee Readiness in Internship Training - A Mixed-Methods Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The provision of graded supervision affording progressive autonomy is fundamental to the progression of a medical learner toward competency for independent practice; the decision of how much supervision versus autonomy to provide a trainee in the execution of clinical care constitutes an entrustment decision. Despite entrustment decision making occurring both daily in practice and summatively at points of matriculation through stages of medical training, the factors influencing entrustment decisions remain poorly understood across clinical contexts. Objective: This study was designed to explore the central research question: How are entrustment decisions made in the medical intensive care unit (ICU)? Methods: This qualitative case study used semistructured interviews with attending pulmonary and critical care physicians in the medical ICU at a major midwestern medical center to explore the entrustment decision-making process as it was enacted in the clinical environment. Results: Five major themes emerged from the data: Conclusion: The process of entrustment decision making in the ICU is more complex than prior frameworks have captured; a model with more complete incorporation of the factors that influence entrustment in the ICU is presented. It is not clear how often
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.