Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628248›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2024

Forensic interviews conducted with autistic adults in Japan: a review of the literature and directions for future research.

Dave Walsh, Graham Brooks, Makiko Naka, Gavin Oxburgh, Akira Kyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dave WalshSchool of Law, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-6830
Graham BrooksSchool of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-2932
Makiko NakaDepartment of Psychology, Ritsumeikin University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-0174
Gavin OxburghDepartment of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-1673
Akira KyoDepartment of Law, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-3178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interviewing of victims, witnesses and suspects is important in helping resolve criminal investigations. In Japan, developments have recently occurred in the training of the police and their public prosecutors in these key tasks. Whilst literature exists on autism in Japan, studies examining police/public prosecutor interviews with autistic adults conducted in that country (and indeed, any other) remain scant. As elsewhere in the world, identification of those who manifest characteristics prevalent on the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) scale, has been found to be problematical to criminal justice professionals. To help address this deficit in understanding, we provide an overview of the literature concerning contemporary understanding of the challenges facing autistic adults as they attempt to reveal their verbal accounts, as well as suggested techniques when interviewing adults on the ASD scale during criminal investigations, offering lessons learned from research conducted around the world that provide potentially promising solutions for Japan.

Indexed as

autismdevelopmental disordersJapanpolicepolice interviewingpublic prosecutorssuspectsvictimsvulnerabilitieswitnesses

Identifiers

PMID38628248
PMCPMC11018090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.