Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628235›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024

Reaching consensus on factors impacting optimal use of an orthopaedic emergency theatre in a public hospital.

Mamiki Ramokopelwa, Mabitja Moeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mamiki RamokopelwaDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0837-5021
Mabitja MoetaDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-403X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The operating theatre (OT) complex of hospitals represents areas of considerable expenditure with regard to costs and requires maximum use to ensure optimum cost benefit for both patients and the hospital. Inefficient use of an operating theatre room (OTR) may result in hospital wasteful expenditure and frustrations for patients owing to surgery delays, cancellations and prolonged hospitalisation while waiting. Aim: The aim of the study was to explore and describe using a consensus method, factors impacting the use of an emergency orthopaedic theatre that can be optimised in a selected public hospital in Gauteng province. Setting: The study was conducted by a professional nurse and orthopaedic surgeon working in the theatre of a selected public hospital in Gauteng province. Method: A qualitative, explorative and descriptive design was adopted. Data were collected using a nominal group technique (NGT) among professional nurses and orthopaedic surgeons. Data analysis was done through cross-analysis where participants reached a consensus on the voted ideas from the group. Results: Consensus was reached and three main themes emerged: (1) inadequate resources; (2) poor organisation and (3) communication. Conclusion: The optimal use of an emergency orthopaedic theatre is influenced by the availability of resources being human and material, good organisation and clear communication. Contribution: The study has demonstrated that a variety of factors needs to be considered to optimise the use of an orthopaedic emergency theatre. The management of an OT requires a concerted effort from the nurses and doctors.

Indexed as

elective proceduresemergencyoperating theatreoptimal useorthopaedic emergency theatre

Identifiers

PMID38628235
PMCPMC11019074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.