Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628172›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2024

LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in Australian native passion fruits and their potential antioxidant activities.

Haoyao Liu, Osman Tuncay Agar, Ali Imran, Colin J Barrow, Frank R Dunshea, Hafiz A R Suleria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haoyao LiuSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.
Osman Tuncay AgarSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1676-2443
Ali ImranSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.
Colin J BarrowCentre for Sustainable Bioproducts, School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia.
Frank R DunsheaSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.
Hafiz A R SuleriaSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passion fruits, renowned globally for their polyphenolic content and associated health benefits, have enjoyed growing attention from consumers and producers alike. While global cultivar development progresses, Australia has pioneered several native cultivars tailored for its distinct planting conditions. Despite their cultivation, comprehensive studies on the phenolic profiles and antioxidant capacities of these Australian-native passion fruits are notably lacking. This study aims to investigate and compare the polyphenolic content present in the by-products, which are peel (L), and consumable portions, which are the pulp and seeds (P), of four indigenous cultivars: 'Misty Gem' (MG), 'Flamengo' (FG), 'Sweetheart' (SW), and 'Panama' (SH). Employing LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS for profiling, a comprehensive list of polyphenols was curated. Additionally, various antioxidant assays-DPPH, FRAP, ABTS, RPA, FICA, and •OH-RSA-were performed to evaluate their antioxidant potential. A total of 61 polyphenols were identified, categorized into phenolic acid (19), flavonoids (33), and other phenolic substances (9). In the antioxidant assays, the SHP sample exhibited the highest •OH

Indexed as

antioxidant capacityAustralian passion fruitsLC‐ESI‐QTOF‐MS/MSphenolic profilespolyphenolic content

Identifiers

PMID38628172
PMCPMC11016391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.