Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38628040›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Experiences of predictive genetic testing in inherited motor neuron disease: Findings from a qualitative interview study.

Jade Howard, Karen Forrest Keenan, Fadhila Mazanderani, Martin R Turner, Louise Locock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jade HowardSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-593X
Karen Forrest KeenanEpidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Fadhila MazanderaniScience, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Martin R TurnerNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Louise LocockHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Motor Neurone Disease Association Locock/Sept19/941-794University of Aberdeen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive genetic testing is increasingly available for individuals with a heightened risk of motor neuron disease (MND). However, little is known about how they decide whether or not to get tested, and how they experience this process. This paper reports findings from a constructivist grounded theory-informed interview study with 24 family members of people with identified or suspected inherited MND (iMND). Fourteen did not know their genetic status, and nine had decided to have predictive testing, of whom six tested positive for the pathogenic gene variant identified in their family and three tested negative. One additional person was identified as negative through a parent's negative result. This paper explores the diverse ways people approached testing, and the many factors and motivations involved, based on personal attitudes and goals, experiences of living with genetic risk, and wider family considerations and circumstances. Results were met with a range of emotions; whatever the outcome, the news disrupted each person's view of the future, and they adapted in their own way and time. Support after results was variable and a perceived lack of support impacted coping and the ability to move forwards. This paper situates findings against literature on other genetic conditions, highlighting experiences as grounded in the unique characteristics of iMND. Thus, it emphasizes the need for disease-specific guidelines and support structures around predictive genetic testing in this context. Understanding people's experiences and responding to these needs is particularly timely given the uptake of testing amongst this group is anticipated to rise with increasing access to genetic testing for people with MND, and gene-specific clinical trials.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingMotor Neuron DiseaseAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchamyotrophic lateral sclerosisgenetic testinglived experiencemotor neuron diseasepredictive genetic testingqualitative

Identifiers

PMID38628040
PMCPMC11735176
OpenAlexW4394873796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.