Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627852›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2024

Optimizing remote and rural prehospital resources using air transport of thrombectomy candidates.

Pauli Vuorinen, Piritta Setälä, Sanna Hoppu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. EDEN - Enhanced Dispatch for Efficient Neurointervention: mathematical model from national data.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Helicopter emergency medical services for interfacility transfers: an Italian expert consensus.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pauli VuorinenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, FI-33521, Tampere, PO Box 2000, Finland. pauli.vuorinen@pirha.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-7356
Piritta SetäläEmergency Medical Services, Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
Sanna HoppuEmergency Medical Services, Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
Pirkanmaa Hospital District · FITampere University of Applied Sciences · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Finland, the yearly number of mechanical thrombectomies for acute stroke is increasing and more patients are transported over 100 km to the comprehensive stroke centre (CSC) for definitive care. This leaves the rural townships without immediate emergency medical services (EMS) for hours. In this study we compare the EMS' estimated return times to own station after the handover of a thrombectomy candidate between two transport methods: (1) using ground transportation with an ambulance to the CSC or (2) using a hydrid strategy starting the transportation with an ambulance and continuing by air with a helicopter emergency medical services unit (HEMS).

methodsWe reviewed retrospectively all thrombectomy candidates' transportations from the hospital district of South Ostrobothnia to definitive care at the nearest CSC, Tampere University Hospital from June 2020 to October 2022. The dispatch protocol stated that a thrombectomy candidate's transport begins immediately with an ambulance and if the local HEMS unit is available the patient is handed over to them at a rendezvous. If not, the patient is transported to the CSC by ground. Transport times and locations of the patient handovers were reviewed from the CSC's EMS database and the driving time back to ambulance station was estimated using Google maps. The HEMS unit's pilot's log was reviewed to assess their mission engagement time.

resultsThe median distance from the CSC to the ambulances' stations was 188 km (IQR 149-204 km) and from the rendezvous with the HEMS unit 70 km (IQR 51-91 km, p < 0.001). The estimated median driving time back to station after the patient handover at the CSC was 145 min (IQR 117-153 min) compared to the patient handover to the HEMS unit 53 min (IQR 38-68 min, p < 0.001). The HEMS unit was occupied in thrombectomy candidate's transport mission for a median of 136 min (IQR 127-148 min).

conclusionA hybrid strategy to transport thrombectomy candidates with an ambulance and a helicopter reallocates the EMS resources markedly faster back to their own district.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesStrokeHospitals, UniversityHumansRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyAmbulance preparednessHelicopter emergency medical servicesLarge vessel occlusionStroke

Identifiers

PMID38627852
PMCPMC11022489
OpenAlexW4394845886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.