Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627837›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST).

Ida-Marie T P Arendt, Matthias Gondan, Sophie Juul, Lene Halling Hastrup, Carsten Hjorthøj, Bo Bach, Poul Videbech, Martin Balslev Jørgensen, Stine Bjerrum Moeller

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05833087 narecruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Schema Therapy for Patients With Chronic Treatment Resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion of Southern DenmarkRan2023 to 2029Enrolled129ConditionsTreatment Resistant Depression, Chronic DepressionArmsSchema therapy, Other psychotherapy, Standard care package content
NCT06655623 nacompletednot on this map

A Multiple Case Study of Schema Therapy for Difficult-to-treat Depression - DEPRE-ST*Case

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion of Southern DenmarkRan2024 to 2026Enrolled2ConditionsDepression, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Depression, Treatment Resistant DepressionArmsSchema therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ida-Marie T P ArendtDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark. imarendt@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-4526
Matthias GondanDepartment of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sophie JuulCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Lene Halling HastrupPsychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry in Region Zealand, Faelledvej 6, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.
Carsten HjorthøjCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo BachDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2a, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Poul VidebechCentre for Neuropsychiatric Depression Research, Nordstjernevej 41, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Martin Balslev JørgensenPsychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Stine Bjerrum MoellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKMental Health Services · DKUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

Region Syddanmark 1523TrygFonden 149726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout one third of patients with depression are in a condition that can be termed as "difficult-to-treat". Some evidence suggests that difficult-to-treat depression is associated with a higher frequency of childhood trauma and comorbid personality disorders or accentuated features. However, the condition is understudied, and the effects of psychotherapy for difficult-to-treat depression are currently uncertain. The aim of this trial is to investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of 30 sessions of individual schema therapy versus treatment as usual for difficult-to-treat depression in the Danish secondary, public mental health sector.

methodsIn this randomized, multi-centre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, 129 outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression will be randomized (1:1) to 30 sessions of individual schema therapy or treatment as usual; in this context mainly group-based, short-term cognitive behaviour or psychodynamic therapy. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in depressive symptoms 12 months after randomization, measured on the observer-rated 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version, functional impairment assessed with the Work and Social Adjustment Scale, psychological wellbeing assessed with the WHO-5 Well-being Index, and negative effects of treatment assessed with the Negative Effects Questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes are improvement on patient self-defined outcomes, personal recovery, anxiety symptoms, anger reactions, metacognitive beliefs about anger, and perseverative negative thinking. Outcomes will be assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization; the 12-month time-point being the primary time-point of interest. Outcome assessors performing the depression-rating, data managers, statisticians, the data safety and monitoring committee, and conclusion makers for the outcome article will be blinded to treatment allocation and results. To assess cost-effectiveness of the intervention, a health economic analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on the beneficial and harmful effects, as well as the cost-effectiveness of schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression. The results can potentially improve treatment for a large and understudied patient group.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05833087. Registered on 15th April 2023 (approved without prompts for revision on 27th April 2023).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOutpatientsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchema TherapyTreatment OutcomeChildhood traumaChronic depressionDepressive personality disorderDifficult-to-treat depressionPersistent depressive disorderPsychotherapyRandomized controlled trialSchema therapyTreatment refractory depressionTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID38627837
PMCPMC11022394
OpenAlexW4394872922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.