Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627712›Full record

Trial reportHead & face medicine2024

Assessment of a novel electrochemically deposited smart bioactive trabecular coating (SBTC®): a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Mark Adam Antal, Ramóna Kiscsatári, Gábor Braunitzer, József Piffkó, Endre Varga, Noam Eliaz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Head & face medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06034171 (Clinical Study of Implants With Modified Surface Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06034171 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Study of Implants With Modified Surface Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorSmileDent Kft.Ran2019 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsDental Implant, HydroxyapatiteArmsdental implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark Adam AntalDepartment of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, 6720 Tisza Lajos Krt. 64-66, Szeged, Hungary. antal.mark@szte.hu.
Ramóna KiscsatáriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Gábor BraunitzerdicomLAB Dental, Ltd, Szeged, Hungary.
József PiffkóDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-2685
Endre VargadicomLAB Dental, Ltd, Szeged, Hungary.
Noam Eliaz *Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1184-4706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA randomized controlled clinical trial of dental implants was conducted to compare the clinical properties of a novel electrochemically deposited calcium phosphate coating to those of a common marketed surface treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty implants of the same brand and type were placed in 20 fully edentulous participants requiring mandibular implantation. The two study groups were defined by the surface treatment of the implants. 20 implants in the control group were coated via a commercial electrochemical surface treatment that forms a mixture of brushite and hydroxyapatite, while the remaining 20 in the test group were coated with a novel electrochemical Smart Bioactive Trabecular Coating (SBTC®). A split-mouth design was employed, with each participants receiving one control implant in one mandibular side and a test implant in the other. To mitigate potential operator-handedness bias, control and test implants were randomly assigned to mandibular sides. All cases underwent digital planning, implant placement with a static surgical guide, and participants received locator-anchored full-arch dentures. The primary outcome was implant stability (measured using Osstell ISQ) assessed at insertion, loading, and then 3 months, 9 months, and 2 years post-insertion. The secondary outcome was bone level change (in millimeters) over the 2-year observation period. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) was monitored using the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Complications and adverse events were recorded.

resultsSuccessful osseointegration and implant stability were achieved in all cases, allowing loading. ISQ values steadily increased throughout the observation period. While no significant differences were observed between the SBTC® and control coatings, the test group exhibited a higher ISQ gain. Bone resorption was somewhat lower in the SBTC® but not significantly so. Patients' OHRQL significantly improved after denture delivery and remained stable throughout the follow-up. No complications or adverse events were observed.

conclusionsBased on the study results, we conclude that the new surface treatment is a safe alternative to the widely used control surface, demonstrating similar osseointegrative properties and time-dependent bone level changes. Further research may explore the broader implications of these findings.

trial registrationThe study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier ID: NCT06034171.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsMouth, EdentulousDental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis DesignDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedHumansOsseointegrationQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDental ImplantsDental implantHydroxyapatiteOsseointegrationRFASurface treatment

Identifiers

PMID38627712
PMCPMC11022491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.