ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding extremophiles: insights from bioinformatics, machine learning, and data-driven approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Bloodstream Infections: Shaping the Future of Rapid Diagnostics and Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Challenges and Opportunities in Analyzing Cancer-Associated Microbiomes.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the taxonomic classification tools and visualizers for metagenomic analysis using the Oxford nanopore sequence database.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Article
- Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the rapid increase in throughput of long-read sequencing technologies, recent studies have explored their potential for taxonomic classification by using alignment-based approaches to reduce the impact of higher sequencing error rates. While alignment-based methods are generally slower, k-mer-based taxonomic classifiers can overcome this limitation, potentially at the expense of lower sensitivity for strains and species that are not in the database.
resultsWe present MetageNN, a memory-efficient long-read taxonomic classifier that is robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes. MetageNN is a neural network model that uses short k-mer profiles of sequences to reduce the impact of distribution shifts on error-prone long reads. Benchmarking MetageNN against other machine learning approaches for taxonomic classification (GeNet) showed substantial improvements with long-read data (20% improvement in F1 score). By utilizing nanopore sequencing data, MetageNN exhibits improved sensitivity in situations where the reference database is incomplete. It surpasses the alignment-based MetaMaps and MEGAN-LR, as well as the k-mer-based Kraken2 tools, with improvements of 100%, 36%, and 23% respectively at the read-level analysis. Notably, at the community level, MetageNN consistently demonstrated higher sensitivities than the previously mentioned tools. Furthermore, MetageNN requires < 1/4th of the database storage used by Kraken2, MEGAN-LR and MMseqs2 and is > 7× faster than MetaMaps and GeNet and > 2× faster than MEGAN-LR and MMseqs2.
conclusionThis proof of concept work demonstrates the utility of machine-learning-based methods for taxonomic classification using long reads. MetageNN can be used on sequences not classified by conventional methods and offers an alternative approach for memory-efficient classifiers that can be optimized further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.