Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627587›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Enhancing diagnosis of benign lesions and lung cancer through ensemble text and breath analysis: a retrospective cohort study.

Hao Wang, Yinghua Wu, Meixiu Sun, Xiaonan Cui

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao WangInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Yinghua WuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Meixiu SunInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China. sunmx@bme.cams.cn.
Xiaonan CuiDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Centre of Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China. cuixiaonan1988@163.com.

Funding

Chinese National Key Research and Development Project 2021YFC250040National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302180Non-Profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-JKCS-06Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-009A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of lung cancer (LC) can significantly reduce its mortality rate. Considering the limitations of the high false positive rate and reliance on radiologists' experience in computed tomography (CT)-based diagnosis, a multi-modal early LC screening model that combines radiology with other non-invasive, rapid detection methods is warranted. A high-resolution, multi-modal, and low-differentiation LC screening strategy named ensemble text and breath analysis (ETBA) is proposed that ensembles radiology report text analysis and breath analysis. In total, 231 samples (140 LC patients and 91 benign lesions [BL] patients) were screened using proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry and CT screening. Participants were randomly assigned to a training set and a validation set (4:1) with stratification. The report section of the radiology reports was used to train a text analysis (TA) model with a natural language processing algorithm. Twenty-two volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath and the prediction results of the TA model were used as predictors to develop the ETBA model using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm. A breath analysis model was developed based on the 22 VOCs. The BA and TA models were compared with the ETBA model. The ETBA model achieved a sensitivity of 94.3%, a specificity of 77.3%, and an accuracy of 87.7% with the validation set. The radiologist diagnosis performance with the validation set had a sensitivity of 74.3%, a specificity of 59.1%, and an accuracy of 68.1%. High sensitivity and specificity were obtained by the ETBA model compared with radiologist diagnosis. The ETBA model has the potential to provide sensitivity and specificity in CT screening of LC. This approach is rapid, non-invasive, multi-dimensional, and accurate for LC and BL diagnosis.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsAlgorithmsBreath TestsHumansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityVolatile Organic CompoundsBenign lesionBreath analysisensemble modelLung cancerNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38627587
PMCPMC11021445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.