Trial reportScientific reports2024
Enhancing diagnosis of benign lesions and lung cancer through ensemble text and breath analysis: a retrospective cohort study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Establishment and validation of an Alzheimer's disease diagnostic model on the basis of exhaled volatile organic compound characteristics.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- The mediating role of fasting plasma glucose and systolic blood pressure in the association between Chinese visceral adiposity index and carotid atherosclerosis: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association of AI-Derived Quantitative CT Parameters of Airway, Emphysema, and Pulmonary Vasculature with Lung Cancer: A Cross-Sectional AnalysisCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Differentiating benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules through exhaled breath analysis.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Differentiating Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Using Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds: A Prospective Observational Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- Research hotspots and frontiers of application of mass spectrometry breath test in respiratory diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis of lung cancer (LC) can significantly reduce its mortality rate. Considering the limitations of the high false positive rate and reliance on radiologists' experience in computed tomography (CT)-based diagnosis, a multi-modal early LC screening model that combines radiology with other non-invasive, rapid detection methods is warranted. A high-resolution, multi-modal, and low-differentiation LC screening strategy named ensemble text and breath analysis (ETBA) is proposed that ensembles radiology report text analysis and breath analysis. In total, 231 samples (140 LC patients and 91 benign lesions [BL] patients) were screened using proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry and CT screening. Participants were randomly assigned to a training set and a validation set (4:1) with stratification. The report section of the radiology reports was used to train a text analysis (TA) model with a natural language processing algorithm. Twenty-two volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath and the prediction results of the TA model were used as predictors to develop the ETBA model using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm. A breath analysis model was developed based on the 22 VOCs. The BA and TA models were compared with the ETBA model. The ETBA model achieved a sensitivity of 94.3%, a specificity of 77.3%, and an accuracy of 87.7% with the validation set. The radiologist diagnosis performance with the validation set had a sensitivity of 74.3%, a specificity of 59.1%, and an accuracy of 68.1%. High sensitivity and specificity were obtained by the ETBA model compared with radiologist diagnosis. The ETBA model has the potential to provide sensitivity and specificity in CT screening of LC. This approach is rapid, non-invasive, multi-dimensional, and accurate for LC and BL diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.