Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627585›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Diagnoses of obstetric and postpartum thyroid disease: a Danish validation study.

Anne Myrup Houmøller, Katrine Gerlif, Nanna Maria Uldall Torp, Stine Linding Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Myrup Houmøller *Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Katrine Gerlif *Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nanna Maria Uldall TorpDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stine Linding AndersenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. stine.a@rn.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-6336-1936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different diagnoses of thyroid disease are available in the 10th International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), but the validity of diagnoses related to obstetric and postpartum thyroid disease is unknown. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in the North Denmark Region with a diagnosis of postpartum thyroiditis (PPT) (ICD-10: O905) from 2016 to 2019 or obstetric thyroid disease in 2019 (ICD-10: O992B (hypothyroidism) or O992C (hyperthyroidism)) registered in the Danish National Hospital Register. Information from nationwide registers and medical records were used to assess the validity. Among patients with an O905-diagnosis (n = 40), abnormal thyroid function test results were seen in all cases. A total of eight patients (20.0%) were positive for thyrotropin receptor antibodies postpartum, however, in low titers, and PPT was verified in 39 of 40 cases (97.5%). Altogether 45 of 50 patients with an O992B-diagnosis (90.0%) correctly had hypothyroidism, whereas hyperthyroidism was found in 25 of 39 patients with an O992C-diagnosis (64.1%). This is the first study to validate ICD-10 diagnoses of obstetric and postpartum thyroid disease. A high validity was seen for PPT (O905) and obstetric hypothyroidism (O992B), whereas for obstetric hyperthyroidism (O992C), the diagnosis could not be verified in one third of the cases.

Indexed as

HyperthyroidismHypothyroidismPuerperal DisordersThyroid DiseasesDenmarkFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38627585
PMCPMC11021553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.