Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Measuring social determinants of health in the All of Us Research Program.

Samantha Tesfaye, Robert M Cronin, Maria Lopez-Class, Qingxia Chen, Christopher S Foster, Callie A Gu, Andrew Guide, Robert A Hiatt, Angelica S Johnson, Christine L M Joseph and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07180147 (Arlington Longitudinal Optimal Healthy Aging Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07180147 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Arlington Longitudinal Optimal Healthy Aging Study (ALOHA)

TypeobservationalSponsorMarymount UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled500ConditionsAlzheimer Disease (AD), Cardio Vascular Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Frailty Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Equity gaps in screening utilization for chronic eye conditions: Evidence from a population-based survey in Germany.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Prescription Patterns in themedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Samantha TesfayeDivision of Medical and Scientific Research, All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robert M CroninDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Maria Lopez-ClassDivision of Cohort Development (DCD), All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Qingxia ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Christopher S FosterDivision of Cohort Development (DCD), All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Callie A GuDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew GuideDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert A HiattDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Angelica S JohnsonDivision of Engagement and Outreach, All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christine L M JosephDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Parinda KhatriCherokee Health Systems, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Sokny LimOffice of Data and Analytics, All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tamara R LitwinDivision of Medical and Scientific Research, All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Fatima A MunozDivision of Health Support Services, San Ysidro Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Andrea H RamirezOffice of Data and Analytics, All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Heather SansburyAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David G SchlundtDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Emma N VieraUnlimited Potential, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Elif Dede-YildirimOffice of Data and Analytics, All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cheryl R ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. crclark@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

All of Us Research Program Data and Research CenterOT2OD035404 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Melissa Basford, DAVID GLAZER · 2023 to 2026
$210.4M
Technology to Empower Changes in Health (TECH) Network Participant Technologies CenterU24OD023176 · OD · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TOPOL, ERIC JEFFREY · 2016 to 2022
$204.7M
PTSC 2.0OT2OD030043 · OD · VIGNET, INC. · PI BEGALE, MARK, JAIN, NEETA · 2020 to 2025
$191.1M
Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program BiobankU24OD023121 · OD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CEKANOVA, MARIA, CICEK, MINE · 2016 to 2024
$185.5M
University of Arizona-Banner Health All of Us Research Program OT2OD026549 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MORENO, FRANCISCO A, REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2018 to 2023
$78.9M
California Precision Medicine Research Program ConsortiumOT2OD026552 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANTON-CULVER, HODA A, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2018 to 2023
$73.4M
All of Us PennsylvaniaOT2OD026554 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E, VISWESWARAN, SHYAM · 2018 to 2023
$72.1M
New York City Consortium for Precision MedicineOT2OD026556 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BIER, LOUISE E, GHARAVI, ALI G · 2018 to 2023
$67.3M
SouthEast Enrollment Center (SEEC) OT2OD026551 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, COLON, VIVIAN · 2018 to 2023
$62.8M
Southern All of Us NetworkOT2OD026548 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N., KORF, BRUCE R · 2018 to 2023
$60.5M
Illinois Precision Medicine Consortium OT2OD026557 · OD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, ARGOS, MARIA · 2018 to 2023
$60.5M
Trans-America Consortium of the Health Care Systems Research Network for the All of Us Research ProgramOT2OD026550 · OD · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI AHMEDANI, BRIAN KENNETH, JOHNSON, CHRISTINE C · 2018 to 2022
$57.3M
NIH HHS OT2 OD025276NIH HHS OT2 OD025277NIH HHS OT2 OD025315NIH HHS OT2 OD025337NIH HHS OT2 OD026548NIH HHS OT2 OD026549NIH HHS OT2 OD026550NIH HHS OT2 OD026551NIH HHS OT2 OD026552NIH HHS OT2 OD026554NIH HHS OT2 OD026555NIH HHS OT2 OD026556NIH HHS OT2 OD026557NIH HHS OT2 OD030043NIH HHS OT2 OD035404NIH HHS U24 OD023121NIH HHS U24 OD023176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To accelerate medical breakthroughs, the All of Us Research Program aims to collect data from over one million participants. This report outlines processes used to construct the All of Us Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) survey and presents the psychometric characteristics of SDOH survey measures in All of Us. A consensus process was used to select SDOH measures, prioritizing concepts validated in diverse populations and other national cohort surveys. Survey item non-response was calculated, and Cronbach's alpha was used to analyze psychometric properties of scales. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine associations between demographic categories and item non-response. Twenty-nine percent (N = 117,783) of eligible All of Us participants submitted SDOH survey data for these analyses. Most scales had less than 5% incalculable scores due to item non-response. Patterns of item non-response were seen by racial identity, educational attainment, income level, survey language, and age. Internal consistency reliability was greater than 0.80 for almost all scales and most demographic groups. The SDOH survey demonstrated good to excellent reliability across several measures and within multiple populations underrepresented in biomedical research. Bias due to survey non-response and item non-response will be monitored and addressed as the survey is fielded more completely.

Indexed as

Population HealthSocial Determinants of HealthHealth SurveysHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38627404
PMCPMC11021514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.