ArticleJournal of aging & social policy2024
Leveraging Existing Datasets to Advance Family Caregiving Research: Opportunities to Measure What Matters.
Article in Journal of aging & social policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking decedents and their family members to study multiple end-of-life outcomes in various settings from a population registry.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Caregiving and Mental Stress among Family Caregivers for People with Disabilities: A Cross-sectional Survey of 40,600 Chinese Households.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- Caregiving at end-of-life: How do family structure and dementia status impact antidepressant and anxiolytic prescriptions among families?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Beyond the Primary Caregiver: A Scoping Review of Family-Centered Dementia Caregiving Programs.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More than 17.7 million people in the U.S. care for older adults. Analyzing population datasets can increase our understanding of the needs of family caregivers of older adults. We reviewed 14 U.S. population-based datasets (2003-2023) including older adults' and caregivers' data to assess inclusion and measurement of 8 caregiving science domains, with a focus on whether measures were validated and/or unique variables were used. Challenges exist related to survey design, sampling, and measurement. Findings highlight the need for consistent data collection by researchers, state, tribal, local, and federal programs, for improved utility of population-based datasets for caregiving and aging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.