ReviewSpinal cord series and cases2024
Bilateral tibial fractures associated with powered exoskeleton use in complete spinal cord injury - a case report & literature review.
Review in Spinal cord series and cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPowered robotic exoskeleton (PRE) physiotherapy programmes are a relatively novel frontier which allow patients with reduced mobility to engage in supported walking. Research is ongoing regarding their utility, risks, and benefits. This article describes the case of two fractures occurring in one patient using a PRE. CASE: We report the case of a 54 year old man who sustained bilateral tibial fractures while using a PRE, on a background of T10 AIS A SCI. The initial session was discontinued due to acute severe bilateral knee swelling after approximately 15 min. The patient attended their local hospital the following day, where radiographs demonstrated bilateral proximal tibial fractures. The patient was treated with manipulation under anaesthetic and long-leg casting for five weeks, at which point he was stepped down to hinged knee braces which were weaned gradually while he remained non-weight bearing for 12 weeks. The patient was investigated with DEXA scan and was diagnosed with osteoporosis. He was liaised with rheumatology services and bone protection was initiated. Fracture healing was achieved and weight-bearing precautions were discontinued, however this period of immobilisation led to significant spasticity. The patient was discharged from orthopaedic services, with ongoing rehabilitation and physiotherapy follow-up.
conclusionPRE assisted physiotherapy programmes are a promising concept in terms of rehabilitation and independence, however they are not without risk and it is important that both providers and patients are aware of this. Furthermore, SCI patients are at increased risk for osteoporosis and should be monitored and considered for bone protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.