ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Improved recovery of cardiac auscultation sounds using modified cosine transform and LSTM-based masking.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intelligent traffic congestion forecasting using BiLSTM and adaptive secretary bird optimizer for sustainable urban transportation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study on incentive mechanism of reward and punishment on work efficiency of PCB welder based on recurrence quantification analysis and electroencephalogram signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obtaining accurate cardiac auscultation signals, including basic heart sounds (S1 and S2) and subtle signs of disease, is crucial for improving cardiac diagnoses and making the most of telehealth. This research paper introduces an innovative approach that utilizes a modified cosine transform (MCT) and a masking strategy based on long short-term memory (LSTM) to effectively distinguish heart sounds and murmurs from background noise and interfering sounds. The MCT is used to capture the repeated pattern of the heart sounds, while the LSTMs are trained to construct masking based on the repeated MCT spectrum. The proposed strategy's performance in maintaining the clinical relevance of heart sounds continues to demonstrate effectiveness, even in environments marked by increased noise and complex disruptions. The present work highlights the clinical significance and reliability of the suggested methodology through in-depth signal visualization and rigorous statistical performance evaluations. In comparative assessments, the proposed approach has demonstrated superior performance compared to recent algorithms, such as LU-Net and PC-DAE. Furthermore, the system's adaptability to various datasets enhances its reliability and practicality. The suggested method is a potential way to improve the accuracy of cardiovascular diagnostics in an era of rapid advancement in medical signal processing. The proposed approach showed an enhancement in the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by 9.6 dB at an input SNR of - 6 dB and by 3.3 dB at an input SNR of 10 dB. The average signal distortion ratio (SDR) achieved across a variety of input SNR values was 8.56 dB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.