ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2024
Brain morphometry and estimation of aging brain in subjects with congenital untreated isolated GH deficiency.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of pediatric patients with congenital isolated growth hormone deficiency resulting from biallelic variants in the GHRHR gene: a Belgian registry study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Growth Hormone and IGF-1 Actions in the Brain and Neuropsychiatric Diseases.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Brain Functional and Structural Changes of Breast Cancer After Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIndividuals with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) due to a mutation in the GHRH receptor gene have a normal life expectancy and above 50 years of age, similar total cognitive performance, with better attention and executive function than controls. Our objectives were to evaluate their brain morphometry and brain aging using MRI.
methodsThirteen IGHD and 14 controls matched by age, sex, and education, were enrolled. Quantitative volumetric data and cortical thickness were obtained by automatic segmentation using Freesurfer software. The volume of each brain region was normalized by the intracranial volume. The difference between the predicted brain age estimated by MRI using a trained neuronal network, and the chronological age, was obtained. p < 0.005 was considered significant and 0.005 < p < 0.05 as a suggestive evidence of difference.
resultsIn IGHD, most absolute values of cortical thickness and regional brain volumes were similar to controls, but normalized volumes were greater in the white matter in the frontal pole and in the insula bilaterally, and in the gray matter, in the right insula and in left Caudate (p < 0.005 for all comparisons) We also noticed suggestive evidence of a larger volume in IGHD in left thalamus (p = 0.006), right thalamus (p = 0.025), right caudate (p = 0.046) and right putamen (p = 0.013). Predicted brain ages were similar between groups.
conclusionIGHD is primarily associated with similar absolute brain measurements, and a set of larger normalized volumes, and does not appear to alter the process of brain aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.