Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627322›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

A survey of experimental stimulus presentation code sharing in major areas of psychology.

Amit Rawal, Vuong Truong, Yu-Hui Lo, Lin-Yuan Tseng, Niall W Duncan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amit Rawal *Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany.
Vuong Truong *Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Hui LoGraduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lin-Yuan TsengGraduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Niall W DuncanGraduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. niall.w.duncan@gmail.com.
Taipei Medical University · TWErnst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience · DE

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2410-H-038-008-MY2, 110-2628-H-038-001-MY4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer code plays a vital role in modern science, from the conception and design of experiments through to final data analyses. Open sharing of code has been widely discussed as being advantageous to the scientific process, allowing experiments to be more easily replicated, helping with error detection, and reducing wasted effort and resources. In the case of psychology, the code used to present stimuli is a fundamental component of many experiments. It is not known, however, the degree to which researchers are sharing this type of code. To estimate this, we conducted a survey of 400 psychology papers published between 2016 and 2021, identifying those working with the open-source tools Psychtoolbox and PsychoPy that openly share stimulus presentation code. For those that did, we established if it would run following download and also appraised the code's usability in terms of style and documentation. It was found that only 8.4% of papers shared stimulus code, compared to 17.9% sharing analysis code and 31.7% sharing data. Of shared code, 70% ran directly or after minor corrections. For code that did not run, the main error was missing dependencies (66.7%). The usability of the code was moderate, with low levels of code annotation and minimal documentation provided. These results suggest that stimulus presentation code sharing lags behind other forms of code and data sharing, potentially due to less emphasis on such code in open-science discussions and in journal policies. The results also highlight a need for improved documentation to maximize code utility.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationHumansPsychologyResearch DesignSoftwareSurveys and QuestionnairesExperiment codeOpen scienceReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID38627322
OpenAlexW4394840903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.