Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627290›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Medical image foundation models in assisting diagnosis of brain tumors: a pilot study.

Mengyao Chen, Meng Zhang, Lijuan Yin, Lu Ma, Renxing Ding, Tao Zheng, Qiang Yue, Su Lui, Huaiqiang Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengyao ChenDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Meng ZhangNVIDIA Corporation, Chengdu, China.
Lijuan YinDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lu MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Renxing DingIT center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tao ZhengIT center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiang YueDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Su LuiDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Huaiqiang SunDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. sunhuaiqiang@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-6065
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974278Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province 24NSFSC1207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo build self-supervised foundation models for multicontrast MRI of the whole brain and evaluate their efficacy in assisting diagnosis of brain tumors.

methodsIn this retrospective study, foundation models were developed using 57,621 enhanced head MRI scans through self-supervised learning with a pretext task of cross-contrast context restoration with two different content dropout schemes. Downstream classifiers were constructed based on the pretrained foundation models and fine-tuned for brain tumor detection, discrimination, and molecular status prediction. Metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance. Convolutional neural networks trained exclusively on downstream task data were employed for comparative analysis.

resultsThe pretrained foundation models demonstrated their ability to extract effective representations from multicontrast whole-brain volumes. The best classifiers, endowed with pretrained weights, showed remarkable performance with accuracies of 94.9, 92.3, and 80.4%, and corresponding AUC values of 0.981, 0.972, and 0.852 on independent test datasets in brain tumor detection, discrimination, and molecular status prediction, respectively. The classifiers with pretrained weights outperformed the convolutional classifiers trained from scratch by approximately 10% in terms of accuracy and AUC across all tasks. The saliency regions in the correctly predicted cases are mainly clustered around the tumors. Classifiers derived from the two dropout schemes differed significantly only in the detection of brain tumors.

conclusionsFoundation models obtained from self-supervised learning have demonstrated encouraging potential for scalability and interpretability in downstream brain tumor-related tasks and hold promise for extension to neurological diseases with diffusely distributed lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The application of our proposed method to the prediction of key molecular status in gliomas is expected to improve treatment planning and patient outcomes. Additionally, the foundation model we developed could serve as a cornerstone for advancing AI applications in the diagnosis of brain-related diseases.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityClassificationDeep learningGliomaIsocitrate dehydrogenaseMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID38627290
OpenAlexW4394856291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.