ArticleEuropean radiology2024
The virtual reference radiologist: comprehensive AI assistance for clinical image reading and interpretation.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The performance of large language models in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Human-AI collaboration in large language model-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis: a usability study.European radiology · 2025Trial
- Prospective quantitative analysis of hyperparameter and input optimization in GPT-5: comparative contribution to radiologist performance in abdominal radiology.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Insufficient reporting quality in large language model studies in the field of radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Independent and collaborative performance of large language models and healthcare professionals in diagnosis and triage.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating Consistency and Accuracy of GPT-4 Omni to Analyze Thyroid Ultrasound Features and ACR TR Categories to Aid Report GenerationCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- OsiriXGPT: An Innovative AI Co-pilot Plug-In for Seamless Deployment of Generative AI Models in Scan-to-Scan Reporting Workflows.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Access to Clinical Guidelines on LLM-Based Treatment Recommendations for Chronic Hepatitis B.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Performance of GPT-4o Compared to Radiology Residents in Emergency Abdominal Tomography Cases.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- On-table monitoring of prostate MRI could enable tailored utilisation of gadolinium contrast.European radiology · 2025Observational
- Five advanced chatbots solving European Diploma in Radiology (EDiR) text-based questions: differences in performance and consistency.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Boosting LLM-assisted diagnosis: 10-minute LLM tutorial elevates radiology residents' performance in brain MRI interpretation.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Benchmarking the diagnostic performance of open source LLMs in 1933 Eurorad case reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Large language models for disease diagnosis: a scoping review.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Exploring whether ChatGPT-4 with image analysis capabilities can diagnose osteosarcoma from X-ray images.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024Article
- An assessment of ChatGPT in error detection for thyroid ultrasound reports: A comparative study with ultrasound physicians.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLarge language models (LLMs) have shown potential in radiology, but their ability to aid radiologists in interpreting imaging studies remains unexplored. We investigated the effects of a state-of-the-art LLM (GPT-4) on the radiologists' diagnostic workflow. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, six radiologists of different experience levels read 40 selected radiographic [n = 10], CT [n = 10], MRI [n = 10], and angiographic [n = 10] studies unassisted (session one) and assisted by GPT-4 (session two). Each imaging study was presented with demographic data, the chief complaint, and associated symptoms, and diagnoses were registered using an online survey tool. The impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on diagnostic accuracy, confidence, user experience, input prompts, and generated responses was assessed. False information was registered. Linear mixed-effect models were used to quantify the factors (fixed: experience, modality, AI assistance; random: radiologist) influencing diagnostic accuracy and confidence.
resultsWhen assessing if the correct diagnosis was among the top-3 differential diagnoses, diagnostic accuracy improved slightly from 181/240 (75.4%, unassisted) to 188/240 (78.3%, AI-assisted). Similar improvements were found when only the top differential diagnosis was considered. AI assistance was used in 77.5% of the readings. Three hundred nine prompts were generated, primarily involving differential diagnoses (59.1%) and imaging features of specific conditions (27.5%). Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher when readings were AI-assisted (p > 0.001). Twenty-three responses (7.4%) were classified as hallucinations, while two (0.6%) were misinterpretations.
conclusionIntegrating GPT-4 in the diagnostic process improved diagnostic accuracy slightly and diagnostic confidence significantly. Potentially harmful hallucinations and misinterpretations call for caution and highlight the need for further safeguarding measures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Using GPT-4 as a virtual assistant when reading images made six radiologists of different experience levels feel more confident and provide more accurate diagnoses; yet, GPT-4 gave factually incorrect and potentially harmful information in 7.4% of its responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.