Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38626975›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Skin closUre in carPal tunnEl Release (SUPER): protocol for a blinded randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in carpal tunnel release.

Aukusti Savolainen, Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Joonas Sirola, Mikael Hytönen, Aleksi Reito, Noora Heikkinen, Mikko Petteri Räisänen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05503719 (Skin Closure With a Fast Absorbable Braided Suture Versus a Non-absorbable Monofilament Suture in Open Carpal Tunnel Release, a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05503719 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Skin Closure With a Fast Absorbable Braided Suture Versus a Non-absorbable Monofilament Suture in Open Carpal Tunnel Release, a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKuopio University HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled116ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome, Median Nerve EntrapmentArmsSurgical wound closed with an absorbable suture, Surgical wound closed with a non-absorbable suture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aukusti SavolainenUniversity of Eastern Finland School of Medicine, Kuopio, Finland aukusa@student.uef.fi.ORCID 0009-0001-0012-8157
Yrjänä NietosvaaraUniversity of Eastern Finland School of Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
Joonas SirolaUniversity of Eastern Finland School of Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
Mikael HytönenUniversity of Eastern Finland School of Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
Aleksi ReitoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461
Noora HeikkinenUniversity of Eastern Finland School of Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
Mikko Petteri RäisänenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-4898
University of Eastern Finland · FITampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCarpal tunnel syndrome is a common disorder affecting a substantial portion of the general population. Surgical intervention is often deemed necessary, with the median nerve release being one of the most frequent operations. Optimising all the aspects of this procedure can enhance patient satisfaction with the treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We aim to determine the differences in the aesthetic outcome of the scar as well as the pain experienced during the healing process between the use of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures. The primary outcome measure will be the patients' subjective satisfaction with the aesthetic appearance of the scar 1 year after the operation. Secondary outcomes will include a similar evaluation of the aesthetics performed by a blinded outcome assessor, as well as pain experienced by the patients during the 2 weeks postoperatively. The severity and improvement of the patients' symptoms will also be measured by a Finnish version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Costs will be evaluated for both groups. Safety of the wound closure will be followed and reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Savo Hospital District (2319/2021). The trial will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05503719.

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeCicatrixHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuturesTreatment OutcomeClinical TrialHand & wristPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38626975
PMCPMC11029360
OpenAlexW4394859342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.