ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2024
How Can Community Data Be Leveraged to Advance Primary Health Care? A Scoping Review of Community-Based Health Information Systems.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing inequities in access to postpartum hemorrhage prevention: Reframing advance distribution of misoprostol as a test case for health system responsiveness and adaptation.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Exploring electronic health record systems implementation in primary health care centres in Saudi Arabia: pre-post implementation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based health information systems (CBISs) can provide critical insights into how community health systems function, and digitized CBISs may improve the quality of community-level data and facilitate integration and use of CBISs within the broader health system. This scoping review aims to understand how CBISs have been implemented, integrated, and used to support community health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
methodsBoth peer-reviewed and gray literature were included; relevant articles were identified using key terms and controlled vocabulary related to community/primary health care, health information systems, digital health, and LMICs. A total of 11,611 total records were identified from 5 databases and the gray literature. After deduplication, 6,985 peer-reviewed/gray literature were screened, and 95 articles/reports were included, reporting on 105 CBIS implementations across 38 countries.
resultsFindings show that 55% of CBISs included some level of digitization, with just 28% being fully digitized (for data collection and reporting). Data flow from the community level into the health system varied, with digitized CBISs more likely to reach national-level integration. National-level integration was primarily seen among vertical CBISs. Data quality challenges were present in both paper-based and digitized CBISs, exacerbated by fragmentation of the community health landscape with often parallel reporting systems. CBIS data use was constrained to mostly vertical and digitized (partially or fully) CBISs at national/subnational levels.
conclusionDigitization can play a pivotal role in strengthening CBIS use, but findings demonstrate that CBISs are only as effective as the community health systems they are embedded within. Community-level data are often not being integrated into national/subnational health information systems, undermining the ability to understand what the community health needs are. Furthermore, stronger investments within community health systems need to be in place broadly to reduce fragmentation and provide stronger infrastructural and systemic support to the community health workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.