ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2024
Putative protective genomic variation in the Lithuanian population.
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic effect variants associated with survival and protection against complex diseases vary between populations due to microevolutionary processes. The aim of this study was to analyse diversity and distribution of effect variants in a context of potential positive selection. In total, 475 individuals of Lithuanian origin were genotyped using high-throughput scanning and/or sequencing technologies. Allele frequency analysis for the pre-selected effect variants was performed using the catalogue of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Comparison of the pre-selected effect variants with variants in primate species was carried out to ascertain which allele was derived and potentially of protective nature. Recent positive selection analysis was performed to verify this protective effect. Four variants having significantly different frequencies compared to European populations were identified while two other variants reached borderline significance. Effect variant in SLC30A8 gene may potentially protect against type 2 diabetes. The existing paradox of high rates of type 2 diabetes in the Lithuanian population and the relatively high frequencies of potentially protective genome variants against it indicate a lack of knowledge about the interactions between environmental factors, regulatory regions, and other genome variation. Identification of effect variants is a step towards better understanding of the microevolutionary processes, etiopathogenetic mechanisms, and personalised medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.